Is the idea that maybe you know somebody who got infected so you rush out and get the vaccine? How are like half getting infected immediately after the first jab?
The mRNA shots basically tell your immune system to keep duplicating the spike proteins of the virus. If this goes out of control and seriously hurts you, it would be considered that the spike proteins of the virus killed you, not the shot which made them spread like crazy within you.
PCR testing is notorious for giving false positives when the cycle threshold is too high, so I wouldn't be surprised if it gave inaccurate results after a shot. I'm not exactly sure how the rapid antigen tests work, but they are supposed to detect protein fragments so the spike proteins might be enough to do that.
It probably just fucks your immune system so you're more likely to catch it. Unfortunately that's enough to create the illusion of efficacy if in those two weeks the vaxxed is counted as unvaxxed (which is how they are typically counted).
Let's say the population is ten people and five get the vaccine and five don't and on average in a two week period one in five would be expected to catch coof but in those two weeks the vaccine doubles the chance of catching coof. First two weeks one person who is not vaxxed and two who are vaxxed (but not yet counted as vaxxed) catch coof. In the second two weeks, it's back to normal and one in each group catches coof. "Wow, four unvaxxed caught coof and only one vaxxed caught coof! 75 percent effective!" I'm oversimplifying but it would actually be even worse because after the first two weeks two of the five vaxxed have actual protection from having caught the real virus.
Is the idea that maybe you know somebody who got infected so you rush out and get the vaccine? How are like half getting infected immediately after the first jab?
The mRNA shots basically tell your immune system to keep duplicating the spike proteins of the virus. If this goes out of control and seriously hurts you, it would be considered that the spike proteins of the virus killed you, not the shot which made them spread like crazy within you.
That's actually a good point, I've never heard whether spike protein by itself will or will not cause a positive test.
Like did they design the test to measure spike protein rather than other parts of the virus? That would be really insidious if so.
PCR testing is notorious for giving false positives when the cycle threshold is too high, so I wouldn't be surprised if it gave inaccurate results after a shot. I'm not exactly sure how the rapid antigen tests work, but they are supposed to detect protein fragments so the spike proteins might be enough to do that.
It probably just fucks your immune system so you're more likely to catch it. Unfortunately that's enough to create the illusion of efficacy if in those two weeks the vaxxed is counted as unvaxxed (which is how they are typically counted).
Let's say the population is ten people and five get the vaccine and five don't and on average in a two week period one in five would be expected to catch coof but in those two weeks the vaccine doubles the chance of catching coof. First two weeks one person who is not vaxxed and two who are vaxxed (but not yet counted as vaxxed) catch coof. In the second two weeks, it's back to normal and one in each group catches coof. "Wow, four unvaxxed caught coof and only one vaxxed caught coof! 75 percent effective!" I'm oversimplifying but it would actually be even worse because after the first two weeks two of the five vaxxed have actual protection from having caught the real virus.