Media; noun [Latin medius, middle.]...the middle between perceived inspiration and grown comprehension out of it represents suggested information by others; hence media for enter tame mind (entertainment). The real middle represents one being choice in response to balance (need/want).
Balance represents the momentum of flow (inception towards death) for the form (life) within.
I don't understand why nobody
a) using don't (do nothing) and nobody (nothing body) implies ignorance of perceived everything for suggested nothingness. One cannot perceive "nothing" for perception implies being in response to everything perceivable.
b) to choose suggested (information) over perceived (inspiration) implies the choice to ignore need for want; and the consequence of ignoring perceived implies lack of comprehending it. Believing the suggested information by others does not grow ones "under-standing"; it deceives one to "stand under" the will of another. An inversion by suggestion.
I think you're talking about Event 201. It was a pandemic simulation, Bill Gates was in attendance.
I don't understand why nobody sees anything odd about that. If we had a real media they would've been all over that.
Bill Gates has been at more than just this one, as the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation provides funding for this kind of research.
It's interesting that he was there, but it's not the smoking gun everyone thinks it is.
But they are definitely a suspicious group
No question. If someone turns up at the wrong places every time, you should be suspicious.
Media; noun [Latin medius, middle.]...the middle between perceived inspiration and grown comprehension out of it represents suggested information by others; hence media for enter tame mind (entertainment). The real middle represents one being choice in response to balance (need/want).
Balance represents the momentum of flow (inception towards death) for the form (life) within.
a) using don't (do nothing) and nobody (nothing body) implies ignorance of perceived everything for suggested nothingness. One cannot perceive "nothing" for perception implies being in response to everything perceivable.
b) to choose suggested (information) over perceived (inspiration) implies the choice to ignore need for want; and the consequence of ignoring perceived implies lack of comprehending it. Believing the suggested information by others does not grow ones "under-standing"; it deceives one to "stand under" the will of another. An inversion by suggestion.
I didn’t catch that double negative. Thanks