So the traditional answer for these two groups (at least the ones in America) has always been "businesses have the right to fore any employee for any reason".
Now I get the sense that with the massive corporate abuse of power on free speech as well as this subject, opinions may be shifting.
But I am very interested in knowing what people think about this and why.
The megacorps themselves are effectively socialized and are run the same as any socialized state would be.
Who owns (eg.) Boeing? The people who run it? No, the shareholders. Who are the shareholders? Mostly Vanguard, Blackrock, JP Morgan, Chase, Morgan Stanley, Schwab, Citi, B of A, etc...
Who owns all those firms? The shareholders. Who are the shareholders? Mostly Vanguard, Blackrock, JP Morgan, Chase, Morgan Stanley, Schwab, Citi, B of A, etc... And a bunch of people through retirement funds and the like. And then of course rich people.
Can they attend or vote in a Boeing shareholders' meeting? No, because they only indirectly own shares of Boeing. At best they can vote for how Vanguard, Blackrock, et. al do things, but of course they're small potatoes.
So who does vote in a Boeing shareholders meeting. Fund managers of Vanguard, Blackrock, et. al. How do they vote? According to some "Proxy Voting Procedures and Guidelines" document that no one reads. Who wrote that document? Who knows; probably some committee.
How is this any different than a socialist state run centrally run by various State Committees?
These are the same company. Don't know why I feel compelled to point this out, but now you know™
I know they once were, but for some reason I thought they had split up. Guess not.
Chase is the brand for consumer banking, and JPMorgan is the brand for investment/big business banking, basically. They merged in the early '00s, if I recall correctly. I don't know why they'd ever split unless forced to under an antitrust ruling or something.
I’m not going to argue against anything you said