Elections Canada tried to disenfranchise me last October for not wearing a mask and I've been demanding an investigation ever since. It seems they're going to simply pre-empt me this time.
Clearly they are. The temptation is too great not to. When your political enemy is mostly arrayed opposite an issue and you have the chance to leverage that issue to disenfranchise them, you win all current and future battles by doing so. If you assume the right is against mandates, then the best way to beat them bar none is to make their voice in government contingent on compliance. Those who comply will be softened against resistance because they have already compromised their position. Those most strongly against have their voices denied outright.
This is why these issues are foundational to freedom and free speech. "Health" isn't just a potential cudgel against dissent, it is currently used as such. This isn't slippery slope conspiracy; this is clear and present danger.
This (now deleted) page on Elections Ontario's website says all visitors to Elections Ontario locations must be fully vaccinated. @ElectionsON, are you denying unvaccinated people the right to vote in person?
So this is how Kamala will "win" 2024.
Theyll do this immediately before the election and then force all lawsuits to wait until after its over.
"Democracy" is quickly being revealed for the sham it has always been.
Unvaxxed bullets.bombs and fires.still function somehow....
PPC was the ONLY party against lockdowns and mandates.
That seems to be the play in the US as well, though it is completely ridiculous.
Sorry y'all, my fault.
Elections Canada tried to disenfranchise me last October for not wearing a mask and I've been demanding an investigation ever since. It seems they're going to simply pre-empt me this time.
I wonder when the voting stations that pull this crap are going to get torched.
Clearly they are. The temptation is too great not to. When your political enemy is mostly arrayed opposite an issue and you have the chance to leverage that issue to disenfranchise them, you win all current and future battles by doing so. If you assume the right is against mandates, then the best way to beat them bar none is to make their voice in government contingent on compliance. Those who comply will be softened against resistance because they have already compromised their position. Those most strongly against have their voices denied outright.
This is why these issues are foundational to freedom and free speech. "Health" isn't just a potential cudgel against dissent, it is currently used as such. This isn't slippery slope conspiracy; this is clear and present danger.
https://twitter.com/AndrewLawton/status/1480570480331575300