The paper is good but they admit that they are unsure how much of the difference is do to women benefiting from the redistribution.
There was a post way back about Sweden taking down quotas in school admissions as soon as it started helping men.
I do not want to sound like theimposible1 but women have gone tribal and will vote accordingly.
There is a gem in there, it mentions that Norwegian companies that were mandated to have 40% women on the board of directors had a decline in profits. I found that to be funny.
Women have an in-group preference and will vote for policies and welfare that benefit them. The exception is married women, who recognize said gibsmedats take money directly out of their paypigs husbands in the form of taxes.
The paper is good but they admit that they are unsure how much of the difference is do to women benefiting from the redistribution.
There was a post way back about Sweden taking down quotas in school admissions as soon as it started helping men.
I do not want to sound like theimposible1 but women have gone tribal and will vote accordingly.
There is a gem in there, it mentions that Norwegian companies that were mandated to have 40% women on the board of directors had a decline in profits. I found that to be funny.
Women have an in-group preference and will vote for policies and welfare that benefit them. The exception is married women, who recognize said gibsmedats take money directly out of their
paypigshusbands in the form of taxes.Imp1 alt account confirmed?!?!