Not really. Exigent circumstances allow for the police to go in and make sure the crime reported actually happened/purported victim is safe. Once they do, like here, they have to leave.
Yeah, imagine you're home, armed, as you lawfully and morally can be. Cops break down your door, they got a warrant after all. You have no clue, aren't expecting anything. Think it's a home invasion. Shoot at the strangers. Cops return fire. You successfully got the cops to merc someone for you.
That's sort of the point, isn't it? The 4th Amendment doesn't have "Exigent circumstances". But people who were born before us and have already died decided that "yeah, the founders probably meant this" and in the process created situations where you don't have rights "to keep us safe".
Not really. Exigent circumstances allow for the police to go in and make sure the crime reported actually happened/purported victim is safe. Once they do, like here, they have to leave.
Yeah, imagine you're home, armed, as you lawfully and morally can be. Cops break down your door, they got a warrant after all. You have no clue, aren't expecting anything. Think it's a home invasion. Shoot at the strangers. Cops return fire. You successfully got the cops to merc someone for you.
Civil forfeiture.
More laws = more evil
Expect any evidence they find whole doing so of any "wrong doing" they can arrest you for. It's just a way to get around the 4th. Stop licking boots
That's sort of the point, isn't it? The 4th Amendment doesn't have "Exigent circumstances". But people who were born before us and have already died decided that "yeah, the founders probably meant this" and in the process created situations where you don't have rights "to keep us safe".