All of his research involved exploring other men's fundaments.
But you are right about this. I was reading a book on this kind of topic recently, about homosexuality in the British navy - and its punishment.
The author made some ludicrous claims: that one in four British sailors by 1815 was a coon, and that in the year 1800 Britain was 4% black.
This was a university-published ACADEMIC work.
So I did my own research. Turns out that the British Navy in the Carribean in the year 1815 had many black sailors but the Admiralty officially limited their numbers to no more than 4% of a crew (fear of mutiny).
Number of coons in Britian in 1800? A trivial number. Not countable. Elizabeth 1 kicked out all of the coons in the 1590s.
This is why I suggest that anyone interested in history look for books pre-2012 and preferable pre-2000. History as it is being written now is through the lens of political correctness.
It’s hilarious, these are the”historians” that claim random historical figures are gay with no evidence. They’re basically Ancient Aliens for gays.
All of his research involved exploring other men's fundaments.
But you are right about this. I was reading a book on this kind of topic recently, about homosexuality in the British navy - and its punishment.
The author made some ludicrous claims: that one in four British sailors by 1815 was a coon, and that in the year 1800 Britain was 4% black.
This was a university-published ACADEMIC work.
So I did my own research. Turns out that the British Navy in the Carribean in the year 1815 had many black sailors but the Admiralty officially limited their numbers to no more than 4% of a crew (fear of mutiny).
Number of coons in Britian in 1800? A trivial number. Not countable. Elizabeth 1 kicked out all of the coons in the 1590s.
These fags are insane, simply insane.
This is why I suggest that anyone interested in history look for books pre-2012 and preferable pre-2000. History as it is being written now is through the lens of political correctness.