I have no interest in controlling them, or killing them.
This is why you lose because they have interest in controlling you.
I just want their plot ended and those involved punished.
This is contradictory to the previous claim in that you need power to achieve this.
How does having kids stop them amassing power exactly?
First, it creates a mutually fulfilling bond between you and a woman, who might otherwise go off and become a spiteful feminist, assuming you are capable of being the patriarch that a Man should be, which is doubtful in your current state. Second, it gives you direct control over a part of the next generation, again assuming you have the will to insulate them from the regime's indoctrination instead of abrogating your responsibilities to the system. Civilization is built by Men who plant trees in whose shade they will never sit. But, it sounds like you would prefer to wallow in your own hedonism and enslaved by your materialistic vices, so have fun with that.
Having power is not the same as controlling them. A trial for crimes against humanity is not exerting control, it's getting justice for their victims.
There is no bond. Their only thought of us is that we are ATMs that talk. If you live in such delusions that you don't think "love" and "bonding" are just your lizard brain tricking you into having kids, then I don't think this conversation will go anywhere useful.
which is doubtful in your current state.
I'm $ur€ I ¢ould provid€ what the¥ n€€d.
Second, it gives you direct control over a part of the next generation,
Yes, by producing the next wave of people to be indoctrinated by the 90% female profession of education...
But, it sounds like you would prefer to wallow in your own hedonism and ruled by your materialistic vices, so have fun with that.
I would make sacrifices if it meant I got closer to watching the More Feminine Way conspirators get their Nuremberg Trial.
Nothing interests me other than justice. I don't wish to forgive or fix them. I wish to punish the obvious enemy and throw the rest into the background, ignoring their existence.
I guess you could call it...The Less Feminine Way™
This conversation clearly can't go anywhere because you are basically Richard Spencer if he focused on sex instead of race. He accepts every progressive premise and agrees with everything they want to achieve, except he wants the good stuff to go to whites.
This is why you lose because they have interest in controlling you.
This is contradictory to the previous claim in that you need power to achieve this.
First, it creates a mutually fulfilling bond between you and a woman, who might otherwise go off and become a spiteful feminist, assuming you are capable of being the patriarch that a Man should be, which is doubtful in your current state. Second, it gives you direct control over a part of the next generation, again assuming you have the will to insulate them from the regime's indoctrination instead of abrogating your responsibilities to the system. Civilization is built by Men who plant trees in whose shade they will never sit. But, it sounds like you would prefer to wallow in your own hedonism and enslaved by your materialistic vices, so have fun with that.
Having power is not the same as controlling them. A trial for crimes against humanity is not exerting control, it's getting justice for their victims.
There is no bond. Their only thought of us is that we are ATMs that talk. If you live in such delusions that you don't think "love" and "bonding" are just your lizard brain tricking you into having kids, then I don't think this conversation will go anywhere useful.
I'm $ur€ I ¢ould provid€ what the¥ n€€d.
Yes, by producing the next wave of people to be indoctrinated by the 90% female profession of education...
I would make sacrifices if it meant I got closer to watching the More Feminine Way conspirators get their Nuremberg Trial.
Nothing interests me other than justice. I don't wish to forgive or fix them. I wish to punish the obvious enemy and throw the rest into the background, ignoring their existence.
I guess you could call it...The Less Feminine Way™
This conversation clearly can't go anywhere because you are basically Richard Spencer if he focused on sex instead of race. He accepts every progressive premise and agrees with everything they want to achieve, except he wants the good stuff to go to whites.
Progressivism means nothing, it's a bunch of divisive bullshit to direct people's attention away from the More Feminine Way.
See BLM, CRT, transgenderism. All created by the More Feminine Way.
Thank you for demonstrating my point.