"Everyone I Dont Like is a Nazi" - the left's/idiot's guide to winning online arguments
It's incredible to think there are people like you, on this site of all places, where people congregate that have been subjected to the logical fallacies, name calling, and censorship of the left, and yet you still think we would succumb to those same bullshit argumentative tactics. Pathetic.
The left's central thesis is lies. It's why they're bad. They're antithetical to truth in everything they say and do. They use lies to manipulate and control people. It's why they must censor the truth on every medium they control.
One of the best ways to figure out truth is good debate, which requires both sides be civil, honest, logical, and prioritize truth over their own position. When someone prioritizes truth over themselves, even when they're proven wrong on something they believe, they still win. It is better to be proven wrong and realign with truth than to remain ignorant. Ideas must be challenged. Without challenge, they remain weak, and we can't be sure if they're true. If someone places themselves over truth, or has ulterior motives they prioritize over truth, then they're not really interested in truth, and will sacrifice it for their own motivations. Only fools place themselves over truth. It's because they deny their own humanity: that we're imperfect, finite, mortal, have free will, and are capable of change. We can't know everything, and everything we do know is suspect. Someone claiming they're right, on something that can and needs to be challenged, believes themselves to be God, incapable of being wrong.
There is one loophole to this, however: logic. There's a reason why logic is a necessary requirement for good debate. It forces people to align with the truth. Just as truth doesn't change from person to person, neither does logic. It's why everyone can do math, at any location, at any time, and always get the correct answer (if they know the correct logic). The only limitation to our understanding of logic is that it can be incomplete. We might understand 2 lines of logic about a specific topic, but maybe there are other lines of logic involved we haven't figured out. That is another reason why good debate, testing, and challenge of ideas is necessary, to reveal the things we don't know.
If someone is being illogical, or using logically fallacious arguments, it means it's impossible to have any constructive debate or conversation with them. At the low level, it usually means they're too emotional. As I said, the left is inherently antithetical to truth, and are also illogical by their nature. They use logical fallacies in every "debate" they do. At the upper level, this is done to manipulate and control people, so they can gain power over them.
You parallel and repeat the left's tactics and motivations. You use ad hominems against people you disagree with. You use logically fallacious arguments. This means that you have ulterior motives, that you don't want good debate, and you don't want what good debate reveals: the truth. In essence, you're a liar, and deserve to be treated as such. Nothing you say can be trusted. Fortunately, if you're genuine, you're free to change and correct yourself at any time, but that choice is up to you, not me.
You're denying the possibility that people that have been here all along have changed. I have. I used to be a full on MIGA Republican until a few years ago. My views have changed according to new and better information and arguments I've come across. I'm not brigading or trolling anything, I've been here all along. I read TD on Reddit heavily, which is why I came here after it was censored. If you've been reading select threads on TD, or the comment section on the Youtube trailer for Santa Inc, or the comments on Gab, or any place that doesn't censor, it should be pretty obvious.
What if you fell to worse than CNN l3vel of propaganda and fake news? There is a reason why the conspiracy theories these stormcucks peddle have NEVER been proven true. Think of it like the pee dossier against Trump.
No, I don't, you're assuming again. I am not going to just say "Go ahead, attack the theoretical jew!" because retards will do like you're doing, twisting it to mean 'attacking jews is fine, goyim, I will scream harder because deedlediedledeedledum.' You think you can catch me in a logic trap, you won't. But you're probably retarded and a troll. So, go ahead, keep stroking your pussy beard and enjoy the delusions you spin.
And to the right of Reagan? God what a fucking moron. On many issues, I am to the right of Reagan.
Indeed. Like tyranids, clanners, zergs, or even cancer. With cancer we destroy the cells but it always comes back. The worst thing is that .win is has lung cancer (cumsume product) and it is currently spreading all over its body. The brains, patriots.win destroys those cells fast, but sometimes they fail to eliminate those cells and their cancerous crap lingers in there.
I even had a retarded stormfuck doubting who created .win and that this comes from Trump supporters, and that this website is even likely run by Jews too. Never got a reply when I asked him to tell us the story behind the .win
If it goosesteps like a stormcuck...
"Everyone I Dont Like is a Nazi" - the left's/idiot's guide to winning online arguments
It's incredible to think there are people like you, on this site of all places, where people congregate that have been subjected to the logical fallacies, name calling, and censorship of the left, and yet you still think we would succumb to those same bullshit argumentative tactics. Pathetic.
And the fact that you're getting hysterical over the term stormfag being applied to a stormfag means you're one too.
Stormfags aren't nazis, they'd be called nazis if they had the balls to actually be one. That's why they're fags.
LOL. You just did it again, unironically.
The left's central thesis is lies. It's why they're bad. They're antithetical to truth in everything they say and do. They use lies to manipulate and control people. It's why they must censor the truth on every medium they control.
One of the best ways to figure out truth is good debate, which requires both sides be civil, honest, logical, and prioritize truth over their own position. When someone prioritizes truth over themselves, even when they're proven wrong on something they believe, they still win. It is better to be proven wrong and realign with truth than to remain ignorant. Ideas must be challenged. Without challenge, they remain weak, and we can't be sure if they're true. If someone places themselves over truth, or has ulterior motives they prioritize over truth, then they're not really interested in truth, and will sacrifice it for their own motivations. Only fools place themselves over truth. It's because they deny their own humanity: that we're imperfect, finite, mortal, have free will, and are capable of change. We can't know everything, and everything we do know is suspect. Someone claiming they're right, on something that can and needs to be challenged, believes themselves to be God, incapable of being wrong.
There is one loophole to this, however: logic. There's a reason why logic is a necessary requirement for good debate. It forces people to align with the truth. Just as truth doesn't change from person to person, neither does logic. It's why everyone can do math, at any location, at any time, and always get the correct answer (if they know the correct logic). The only limitation to our understanding of logic is that it can be incomplete. We might understand 2 lines of logic about a specific topic, but maybe there are other lines of logic involved we haven't figured out. That is another reason why good debate, testing, and challenge of ideas is necessary, to reveal the things we don't know.
If someone is being illogical, or using logically fallacious arguments, it means it's impossible to have any constructive debate or conversation with them. At the low level, it usually means they're too emotional. As I said, the left is inherently antithetical to truth, and are also illogical by their nature. They use logical fallacies in every "debate" they do. At the upper level, this is done to manipulate and control people, so they can gain power over them.
You parallel and repeat the left's tactics and motivations. You use ad hominems against people you disagree with. You use logically fallacious arguments. This means that you have ulterior motives, that you don't want good debate, and you don't want what good debate reveals: the truth. In essence, you're a liar, and deserve to be treated as such. Nothing you say can be trusted. Fortunately, if you're genuine, you're free to change and correct yourself at any time, but that choice is up to you, not me.
Amazing responses ITT, thanks for fighting the good fight, for truth to conquer lies
Do us a favour, and read the comments here, and on the sister thread on the CUMsume product community.
If you still think that is not evidence of stormcuckery, then nothing will change your mind.
You're denying the possibility that people that have been here all along have changed. I have. I used to be a full on MIGA Republican until a few years ago. My views have changed according to new and better information and arguments I've come across. I'm not brigading or trolling anything, I've been here all along. I read TD on Reddit heavily, which is why I came here after it was censored. If you've been reading select threads on TD, or the comment section on the Youtube trailer for Santa Inc, or the comments on Gab, or any place that doesn't censor, it should be pretty obvious.
What if you fell to worse than CNN l3vel of propaganda and fake news? There is a reason why the conspiracy theories these stormcucks peddle have NEVER been proven true. Think of it like the pee dossier against Trump.
So what do we call literal shills for Israel who aren't even trying to hide the fact that they are here for the SOLE PURPOSE of protectimg the tribe?
Mossadfags?
You find one who actually is here for that, and not just someone who thinks labeling groups as a whole is wrong, then what the fuck ever.
I want you to notice how upset you get at the idea that a jewish nationalist might be engaged in all those actions you ascribe to "stormcucks."
You hold no reservations about attacking people for perceived ties to nazism or anyone to the right of Reagan, just like a leftist.
Yet, you are terrified and aghast at the idea of jewish supremacists even existing.
I wonder why? 🤔
No, I don't, you're assuming again. I am not going to just say "Go ahead, attack the theoretical jew!" because retards will do like you're doing, twisting it to mean 'attacking jews is fine, goyim, I will scream harder because deedlediedledeedledum.' You think you can catch me in a logic trap, you won't. But you're probably retarded and a troll. So, go ahead, keep stroking your pussy beard and enjoy the delusions you spin.
And to the right of Reagan? God what a fucking moron. On many issues, I am to the right of Reagan.
SJWs infest and destroy everything. Be it the old school SJWs(stormcucks - https://archive.is/wqw4J) or the new ones.
Everything except themselves. They spread like roaches, so it's hard to stomp them out.
Indeed. Like tyranids, clanners, zergs, or even cancer. With cancer we destroy the cells but it always comes back. The worst thing is that .win is has lung cancer (cumsume product) and it is currently spreading all over its body. The brains, patriots.win destroys those cells fast, but sometimes they fail to eliminate those cells and their cancerous crap lingers in there.
I even had a retarded stormfuck doubting who created .win and that this comes from Trump supporters, and that this website is even likely run by Jews too. Never got a reply when I asked him to tell us the story behind the .win
A shame thedonald.win went full-retard.