Canadian court agrees to exclude unvaccinated from jury pool
(westphaliantimes.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (39)
sorted by:
Few thoughts here: Firstly, it’s weird how complete and comprehensive this “apartheid by any other name” is, and how worldwide it is…
Makes me think there must be something seriously dubious going on, which, of course, matches with what many of you have been saying for some time…
Secondly, isn’t it amusing as a thought exercise. Replace “the unvaccinated” with any other minority group: “Jews excluded from jury pool”, “Blacks banned from bars and restaurants”, “Women barred from shops”, “Muslims excluded from major public events”,“Transgenders banned from public transport/transit”, etc, etc, and watch “the Left” go absolutely off their tits…
But then they’ll argue that “it’s a choice”, and that “choices have consequences”…
Guess what else is a “choice”? Arguably, being Jewish. Being Muslim DEFINITELY is. Being transgender, and “out”, most definitely is. According to them, so is being a woman. And finally, when we live in a world where Rachel Dolezal exists, and where “mixed” people almost exclusively choose to identify as their “minority” identity, I would argue that, in many cases (but obviously not in all), being Black is somewhat of a choice, too…
So their argument there doesn’t hold any water, either. Amazing. Try arguing all this with a Leftist. Use historical comparisons where possible. And watch their pathetic little hypocritical brain fucking implode, lol…
You don't really have to imagine it when you consider that the left still calls for segregation under the guise of "protecting the oppressed".