I don't have problem with the way people responds. It's just you. Why would I listen you someone that constantly argues in bad faith and cherrypick a word?
How do you know I'm mad? I have cited evidence while you didn't. What reason should I be mad why I cannot convince a liberal atheist to see my way. That happens all the time. Even when someone who has good speaking skills and research skills can't convince someone like you, I admit at the getgo, I don't have a chance. I only argue with you to let you know why I came to the conclusion the way I did. Nothing more.
You cited zero works of history, and that is because you have read exactly zero works of history.
Even when someone who has good speaking skills and research skills can't convince someone like you
Well, you're certainly not putting those research skills to good use, because you couldn't cite even a single work of history that was guilty of your made-up complaints.
If you don't want people to respond to what you say, then you shouldn't say it.
I don't have problem with the way people responds. It's just you. Why would I listen you someone that constantly argues in bad faith and cherrypick a word?
You just lost. You couldn't back up your claims, hell, you couldn't cite a single work of history you had a problem with, so now you're mad.
How do you know I'm mad? I have cited evidence while you didn't. What reason should I be mad why I cannot convince a liberal atheist to see my way. That happens all the time. Even when someone who has good speaking skills and research skills can't convince someone like you, I admit at the getgo, I don't have a chance. I only argue with you to let you know why I came to the conclusion the way I did. Nothing more.
Cause you brought it up elsewhere.
You cited zero works of history, and that is because you have read exactly zero works of history.
Well, you're certainly not putting those research skills to good use, because you couldn't cite even a single work of history that was guilty of your made-up complaints.