Two of them simply tried to detain a moronic burglar who’d been robbing their neighbour hood and one was simply there and recorded the moron grabbing a shotgun and getting himself shot. Now they all get to spend the rest of their life in prison. The blacks are given free reign to commit every evil there is while whites are treated like subhumans by the nation they built. This nation is doomed and seems to deserve that doom.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (172)
sorted by:
They have affirmative action, are able to burn loot murder without punishment, dehumanize Whites, etc.
I wish i had these gibs and privledges that blacks get
Honestly, no you don't. Look what it's done.
Affirmative Action not only doesn't help, it actually promotes failure and people give up more because they didn't develop the human capital skills to succeed in the space they were placed. Look at the destruction of black communities, the cycle of violence, and the entitlement that they've been taught to have without punishments. Look at how a culture of resentment against whites has colored every aspect of their perspective so that they never take a single step to improve their lives.
You don't want that shit. It's a poison pill.
They're underperforming because they have low IQs, anything else like 'entitlement' or 'they're failing because we help them too much', or whatever else you invent is just cope, rationalization, and post hoc garbage.
There is no reality in which a demographic with a 85 IQ average could do well or compete in modern societies where high information processing skills are required to function.
Besides just the ability to retain and manipulate information IQ correlates extremely well with long term orientation, the ability to delay gratification, crime, low impulse control, violence, success, tolerance of ambiguity, knowledge aquisition, ability for deliberate action, self control, risk managment, ability to learn, and a whole other list of abilities that modern societies expect.
You can collect a group of whites with a 85 IQ average in a neighbourhood and within a couple of generations they will have perfectly recreated for you the inner city life.
Imagine thinking that affirmative action is what's causing violence....
No resentment caused by being made to compete in societies where they can feel they can't possibley succeed is what's causing violence.
Crime being the only viable path to material wealth unless you're artistically or athlethically gifted is what's causing violence.
Then you seem to not understand how genuinely low IQ autistic people are able to still live on their own and function independently and successfully in society. The idea that someone under 85 IQ can't function in society is laughable. We take people who get 32 on the ASVAB in the infantry. We let them use guns, big ones. That 32 basically means they can't even do fractions.
That's precisely where you're wrong. High IQ isn't just a measure of how well you can succeed in society, it's measurement of abstraction and adaptability means that you are also more likely to be selected for breeding rights in societies not already plagued with violence. It's one of the reasons that Jews and Asian immigrants were seen to have very low IQ's and their IQ's grew over the century, just like everyone in the west had their IQ's grow on average. Women are going to sex select for higher IQ due to societal success and adaptation. Women don't marry down, particularly in regards to education and intelligence.
You put a group of any kind of 85 IQ average population in a neighborhood and leave them alone, and you will likely see a 100 IQ average population in a few generations. You will collapse their IQ if you promote protectionism and dependency, along with significant amounts of malnutrition and social violence.
It doesn't cause violence, it causes failure. Typically, AA recipients end up going to educational programs that are far too difficult for them, they tend to drop out of the school, drop out of the entire industry, and never retry at a lesser school which would have done them better. AA promotes impostor syndrome to a degree that people self-destruct their own ambitions because they were never ready to take them on and got burned.
That could eventually lead to significant amounts of resentment, low initiative, and social violence.
Mostly, the violence is being caused by the protection from consequences, lack of investment in their own communities, and zero ownership of goods, and resentment mongering while being the vassals of the state.
That's exactly the thing that Affirmative Action does.
Note that when Trump deported illegal immigrants, poor white and poor black unemployment in the areas he raided soared, because of course it did. You don't need a 175 IQ to pluck chicken feathers for Koch Foods Inc. 85 is more than enough. If low IQ populations couldn't compete, and you're sure that blacks are just too low of IQ to compete in society, why were their wages going up due to their competitiveness. Unless you're going to tell me that all those illegal immigrants from Guatemala were just doctors and lawyers.
I agree, and Socialist policies are major part of that. A low IQ person can sell hotdogs as a hotdog vendor. They can drive uber. Hell, I know dudes who sold water at stadiums for $1 a bottle. They can get low paying jobs and save money. Our entire political, economic, and financial system is designed to disincentivize that as much as humanly possible, particularly in Democratically supported areas.
You changed the goalposts here from 'compete' and 'succeed' to 'function'.
Can a 70 IQ person function in society? Only with help. Unless we're talking about a village where he can stare into the sky all day and lift things when asked and generally just exist in the open and eat with the community.
Can a 85 IQ person function in society? Sure, they can be productive in many different ways.
Can they compete? Can a group with a 85 IQ average achieve parity in terms of salary, or positions of power in corporate or government sectors, or education, or innovation? No. No they can not.
Can they ever be expected to commit crime at a similar rate to 100 IQ groups? No.
You conveniently skipped my paragraph about how IQ correlates with so many other traits than just information processing.
Just having lower impulse control and lower ability to delay gratification means the group will be higher represented in crime statistics. Just those two things alone mean they're much less likely to finish an education, that they will be less reliable workers.
The US military doesn't take anyone with an IQ under about 83. They've done experiments with admitting people with IQs of 80 and high 70s, but concluded that it's not worth the cost, damage, and effort. That is to say that people in the lowest 10th percentile are not only not useful, they actually harm the organization.
This paragraph is not really relevant. Do women sex select for higher IQ? Sure why not. Do they sex select for percieved IQ which is not real IQ but just some adaptability metric / success / how well an individual fits into society? Sure why not.
But we're not talking about how other people see you. We're talking about how well you can score on a standardized test. Go back 200 years and a random ashkenazi jew would probably outscore a random englishman, it doesn't matter that he was percieved to be lower IQ.
If you leave people with 85 IQ alone, they will become smarter? They will have smarter children? You must be joking.
IQ is highly heritable. Its heritability quotient is about 80, that's the same heritability quotient as height.
Now you can critisize the analogy and claim that IQ is determined by several other factors like epigenetics, environment, and passive genes. Ok, it's not the greatest analogy. Maybe that community would become smarter, maybe not. But we know blacks aren't becoming smarter, so whatever epigenetic or passive gene effects are at play, are clearly not affecting that particular demographic.
An 85 IQ society will only become a 100 IQ society if you recalibrate the tests to reflect their normal distribution. Then they will be 100 IQ by definition. However compared to outside groups they will always be 85 IQ.
Sure, maybe, probably. But the alternative to AA is to just accept that blacks will not be able to compete, will be poorer, will have shittier jobs, etc.
Blacks not being as intelligent as other races isn't in itself a black pill. That's a solvable problem, to make sure that they all have some purchasing power and vested interest in society means some structuring is necessary. As a species we're not more hostile or less empathetic to people with lower IQs. Quite the opposite. There are ways of dealing with the fact that some people do worse in society. If you want to keep the multicultural society and solve for lower crime and more stability, that probably means UBI, socialized housing, and legalized drugs.
But as long as the woke cling to blank slate theory, the fact that blacks are underperforming will be a motovator to keep tearing down society. That's the real black pill.
It's why education is being dismantled - equity thrhough tearing down the intelligent to appease the dumb. It's why heroes in popular media are being destroyed - equity through tearing down the brave to appease the anxious.
Accross the board, everything that is good will be torn down to cuddle the feelings of those who can't hit the standard. The lowering of all standards is something you can observe, and while wokeism is a cancer on any society it's clearly much more damaging in societies where lage portions are low IQ, than in more homogenous ones like e.g. China.
I currently am demonized for the color of my skin via crt and affirmative action.
I wish I had the same privledge blacks get from democrats. i would get free scholarships and any high paying job i want due to my skin color, (affirmstive action is black privledge) and then be worshiped by democrats, and never charged with any crime.
You would be a scam artist dependent on your loyalty to race hustlers.
You would get scholarships to schools you couldn't pass tests in. You could get high paying jobs you wouldn't qualify for and would fail out of due to incompetence. You would be worshiped for being a failure. You would be charged with crimes when you weren't the cock sleeve for a politician.
You want to be a living failure and a slave, have at it, but I'd rather you just be better.
Sounds better than being demonized for having White skin