As we now have trans as a protected class it has shown the slippery slope in full free fall from the “gay rights” debate a decade ago. The problem is that laws based on fallacies will always be abused because their is no need to prove that any additions are legitimate. We have known for centuries men and women are not equal, we have known for centuries that racial aggregates depended on the culture dictating genetics. When we pretended that this didn’t matter we opened the door for non-biological protected classes. There has never been any evidence that being gay or trans is genetic, and there has been inconclusive evidence that gay and trans is biological at all aside from the biological impact occurring from grooming. In fact the best biological evidence we have is that external stimuli (aka other people) is what causes biological changes in the individual. Yet now we have more protected classes that are inherently non-biological than provably biological. These abuses are meant to subjugate not protect, they are meant to deny reality in place of accepting it.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (138)
sorted by:
The problem is that the way protected classes are set up, they are technically equal. It's not that trans people are a protected class, it's that your trans status is protected. Under this law, it is equally illegal to fire a normal person for not being trans, which means that now all trans groups are obliged to accept normal people.
Of course, that's all on paper. We all know that the system is never going to enforce it equally. But it's written equally, so it's not unconstitutional. When this results in further oppression of straight white men, they can claim they had no idea that would happen, even though they obviously did.
The problem is never the law, the problem is selective enforcement.