Presented without comment
(media.communities.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (58)
sorted by:
I still remember when "we just want to left alone" was used to push gay shit. Soon it became homophobic to do anything short of celebrating two dudes fucking each other in the ass at a pride parade. Even "do what you want but leave me out of it" is homophobic now.
Same with the tranny shit we're witnessing right now. They said it doesn't harm us if some dude wants to dress as a woman and mutilate himself. Now refusing to go along with a troon's perverted lies or even refusing to fuck one of these evil disgusting creatures is transphobic. It's not enough to just leave them alone.
Anyone with basic pattern recognition knows where this pedo shit is going, especially since they're already giving kiddy diddlers a free pass if put on a wig and dress before they rape a child.
Remember during the gay marriage debate they kept telling us we were engaging in the slippery slop fallacy?
It's funny. Before gay marriage was mandated by SCOTUS one of my English professors told me I couldn't use a slippery slope argument because it's a fallacy. I've never heard a convincing explanation for why that's the case, but all the fucked up shit that's happened since 2015 has done a hell of job "debunking" the idea that it's a fallacy. All the shit conservatives warned us about has happened or is the process of happening. It's not coincidence that these tranny activists keep turning out to be child molesters and beastiality enthusiasts. Kiddy diddlers and animal fuckers are next frontier for "civil rights". LGBTQPZ is about to become a thing.
The slippery slope fallacy is part of the progressive war on reality and pattern recognition. Most fallacies aren't real per se. They are simply rhetorical techniques and calling them out as fallacies is counter-rhetoric to convince people their eyes are lying.
Sigh. What logical fallacy actually means is that something seems to prove something 100% but that is not the case
John wears a coat in the winter.
A person walks into Johns house in the winter wearing a coat.
That person must be John.
This is a logical fallacy because the criteria do not prove 100% the conclusion.
But obviously, it doesn't prove the person isn't john either.
Logical fallacies never, ever prove that something is not true.