Everyone Here Should Sign Up for This Lecture
(communities.win)
Comments (13)
sorted by:
Here’s a free interview with the same two doctors. I imagine the link I sent has a small cost because it is a live event and the cost discourages shills/trolls https://www.brighteon.com/08e2ac4b-461e-4852-b8cf-2c2bded2a1ea
Also, I researched a lot of work of these two guys, and at this point I personally don’t mind throwing money at any of their projects.
Communist!
What is the argument here? Is it that WuFlu is real but the "pandemic" is largely an artifact of data models, sample bias, inappropriately sensitive tests, and state propaganda? Or is is that the whole thing including the virus itself isn't real?
The site makes it seem as though it's the latter, but I wanted to be sure.
This one hour interview with the same two doctors will summarize the position. You can listen instead of watching if that’s easier.
Believe it or not, it’s the latter. I’ve spent hundreds of hours researching this, and the rabbit hole is deep. I can send more info if you’d like
https://www.brighteon.com/08e2ac4b-461e-4852-b8cf-2c2bded2a1ea
What is served by making the argument that the virus isn't real?
If I were trying to poison pill my own position, which is:
If I were trying to poison pill all that -- which I believe if you showed a normal person simple newspaper clippings from the past 18 months and led them through to your conclusion they could easily follow even if they didn't necessarily agree with you -- I would tack on "and to top it all off, the virus isn't even real!" Because even if that's true I don't see how it changes how one responds to everything else that is presented, and it significantly increases the burden of proof for the person making all those other arguments.
I actually completely agree with you, and can do so from personal experience. My taking the position with some people that virology and germ theory are fake (which I believe to be true after a lot of research I have done) has only made the more obvious conclusions you stated less approachable to them.
There’s layers to this. I care about the truth and understanding it. I’m not really presenting this information to convince anyone, or debate it.
HOWEVER: IF we all were mutually able to research and come to the conclusion that viruses as described as a contagious pathogen that spread disease don’t exist to begin with, collectively waking up begins with one person at a time. I didn’t believe it when I first started looking into it. Here I am. Maybe you will be the next. How it changes things is that we have a medical industrial complex that has perpetrated the greatest fraud in human history, resulting in the greatest trans-generational genocide.
Free one hour interview with these doctors:
https://www.brighteon.com/08e2ac4b-461e-4852-b8cf-2c2bded2a1ea
Hour lecture on germ theory:
https://youtu.be/pnN4Dh-h9ls
Can you summarize what the alternative to germ theory is? I've also been going down an anti-virology rabbit hole. I've only found a couple of people who don't appear to be schizos when explaining that viruses can't exist, but they all go full schizo when explaining their alternative.
Interesting, because that is easy. Terrain theory. Here is an hour lecture on the history of germ vs. terrain theory:
https://youtu.be/pnN4Dh-h9ls
Here is a lecture by Tom Cowan literally entitled “Now that we know there are no pathogenic viruses, why do we get sick?”
https://www.brighteon.com/8242678b-07c7-4ee0-937e-40a061d084fd
I’ve communicated with a couple people on these boards about this; it’s how I found out about it. They both appear highly intelligent, informed, well-researched, and not schizo at all.
Cowan is one of the schizos. I'm listening to your brighteon link right now, but I've heard a previous talk where he argues viruses don't exist (which was good) and then goes into how we're all crystalline water.
How funny, since what he is saying is exactly true!
Water research is all part of the actual science that is still being conducted by real scientist that aren’t participating in the institutional academic nonsense designed to gate-keep true knowledge, along with an additional financial incentive to prop up Big Food, Big Pharma, and prevent real innovation (i.e. free energy, anti-aging, etc).
If you actually take the time to study it yourself, you will discover that water is the battery of life, as well as acts as a receiver and transmitter of information. Indeed, the information and power processes of water are the very basis of our entire physical existence.
I would encourage you to actually research something before forming an opinion. Pollack’s book is the best starting point for water, and IMO arguably one of the most important scientific books ever written:
The Fourth Phase of Water: Beyond Solid, Liquid, and Vapor https://www.amazon.com/dp/0962689548
No. You should bootleg it if you want me to watch it. Fucking ridiculous paying to hear peoples conspiracies. When I grew up you sperged out on the internet because of the voices in your head caused by the microwave guns not because of profits.
Here’s a free interview with the same two doctors. I imagine the link I sent has a small cost because it is a live event and it discourages shills/trolls
https://www.brighteon.com/08e2ac4b-461e-4852-b8cf-2c2bded2a1ea