Exactly. He's not necessarily wrong with his surface level analysis, but he always proceeds into single minded insanity on the subject. He doesn't even bother to entertain the notion that some of these problems could be solved by taking women's rights away, he's just full on "everyone should extinguish their family lines and make the entire species extinct and I see zero problems with that. Anything less is being enslaved to women, even if you enslave them instead."
Exactly. He's not necessarily wrong with his surface level analysis, but he always proceeds into single minded insanity on the subject. He doesn't even bother to entertain the notion that some of these problems could be solved by taking women's rights away, he's just full on "everyone should extinguish their family lines and make the entire species extinct and I see zero problems with that. Anything less is being enslaved to women, even if you enslave them instead."
He's not right in the head.
Yes, being forced to provide for them because "the world needs it" is being enslaved by them.