Saw this on Luke's WeAreChange video about it. The headline completely ignores the part that says that the J&J vaccine only has 3% efficacy now after 6 months in a study of 600,000 veterans - that means high possibility of breakthrough infections.
While this vaccine wasn't used much in other countries, it got a fair amount of use here, aaaaand it got a lot of use in Africa.
Can't imagine that makes for a good PR piece if you're trying to save Africa from COVID.
Also disclosure, I got the J&J one in late March and I had a long discussion with my doctor about it. This was before the stupid mandates; she said because of some existing medical conditions I had I'd be better off with it and she knew I did not want to get the Pfizer or Moderna ones. I got it as my choice and I'm 100% in opposition to any mandate that forces you to get it, whether the mandate comes the government or your job.
It's just amusing (and depressing as always) that the article is pointing out that it probably would've been a two-shot regimen just like the other two vaccines but they fucked it up rushing it out. Well what do you think would happen when you rush things out like that?
probably would've been a two-shot regimen just like the other two vaccines but they fucked it up rushing it out. Well what do you think would happen when you rush things out like that?
It's not rushed, though. It's intentional. All of these vaccines are being put out this way on purpose.
The CDC and health officials have even mandated administrators to NOT aspirate, which means there is an increased chance of intravenous travel as opposed to intramuscular localization.
In short, they want to raise the chance of messenger travel, which will result in clotting or other SAEs.
Saw this on Luke's WeAreChange video about it. The headline completely ignores the part that says that the J&J vaccine only has 3% efficacy now after 6 months in a study of 600,000 veterans - that means high possibility of breakthrough infections.
While this vaccine wasn't used much in other countries, it got a fair amount of use here, aaaaand it got a lot of use in Africa.
Can't imagine that makes for a good PR piece if you're trying to save Africa from COVID.
Also disclosure, I got the J&J one in late March and I had a long discussion with my doctor about it. This was before the stupid mandates; she said because of some existing medical conditions I had I'd be better off with it and she knew I did not want to get the Pfizer or Moderna ones. I got it as my choice and I'm 100% in opposition to any mandate that forces you to get it, whether the mandate comes the government or your job.
It's just amusing (and depressing as always) that the article is pointing out that it probably would've been a two-shot regimen just like the other two vaccines but they fucked it up rushing it out. Well what do you think would happen when you rush things out like that?
It's not rushed, though. It's intentional. All of these vaccines are being put out this way on purpose.
The CDC and health officials have even mandated administrators to NOT aspirate, which means there is an increased chance of intravenous travel as opposed to intramuscular localization.
In short, they want to raise the chance of messenger travel, which will result in clotting or other SAEs.