We dont run the media.
We dont run the government.
We dont run social media.
We dont run the banks.
The gloablist left does.
When they use political violence, they get away with it because they run society. When we so much as smirk in the wrong direction, we get treated as terrorists and they get a new reason to expand their power. They have the hearts and minds and power. We dont resort to violence for any moral reason, but because IT WONT FUCKING WORK AND WILL LITERALLY ONLY MAKE THINGS WORSE.
What the right should be doing, is organizing. Prepping. Learning. Talking with normies and opening minds. Its the people vs the full force of the establishment and we dont win this without an organized, intelligent, moral and overwhelmingly large mass of people first.
In a "won't someone rid me of this troublesome priest" way, yes. He effectively was declaring the election (and by extension, the government) illegitimate. Where I differ is I think that if election fraud did in fact occur the way Trump and others claimed, after the Supreme Court refused to hear any of the cases an actual insurrection would have been morally justified since all other legal means of redress had been exhausted.
I also think (and I believe I also said this shortly after 1/6) that I would have had no issue with Trump being executed for his role in what happened, to encourage the next guy to not flinch the way Trump did. Especially given his lack of aid toward any of his supporters currently rotting away in prison.
I wasn't going by what MSM said; I was watching the speeches and rhetoric Trump (and others) were making.
Here's an example of electors being blocked from the Capitol in Michigan. Another one where the Texas GOP was talking about secession after the Supreme Court refused to hear one of their cases. What I said about those things in December:
So did the Dems after 2016.
Maybe it would be, maybe it wouldn't be. But who decides if election fraud (sufficient to change the outcome, I assume) occurred? Anyone can make that claim. And after any election, I'm sure any number of people will think that it occurred. This is a principle unlikely to lead to positive outcomes.
Didn't know you were crazy.
Who appointed these electors? No lawful or legitimate authority.
Sounds to me that you just want mayhem.
Yes, and when their people took to the streets over it the Dems backed them up.
Yes, and and the Reps did in 2020. Then threw their people to the wolves when they took to the streets over it.
Believe what you want, but if you shoot at the king you'd better not miss. His supporters in prison are currently learning that lesson; seems only fair Trump should learn it just as hard.
The GOP was using that as evidence that the election was being stolen. Take it up with them and the poor saps currently rotting in prison for believing them.
No we have that in abundance already. I simply want the right to not throw their base to the wolves when they rile them up. Or to stop riling them up if they aren't going to support them.
Cause their faction controls the media, academia and the deep state. Things work out very differently when you don't, and then decide to back up lawlessness.
Like I told you, thinking that an unorganized mob of boomers is anything like 'shooting at the king' is absurd.
But rather, accepting arguendo that your previous claims were correct, back an attempted revolution with less than 0 chance of success? How come the left did not engage in such idiocy when it was powerless?
Then the right shouldn't be riling up their base the way they do. Which is exactly what I said in December: knock off the "existential threat to the Republic" talk unless you're prepared to take it all the way. Because exactly what I was afraid of happening, happened.
Tell that to the judges and guards trying to "send a message" to the people sitting in prison for being at the Capitol. Or the Capitol Police officer who killed that woman. The people in charge think it was; they say this all the time. And their actions are consistent with that belief.
Who said I want that? I said one would be morally justified. I also said that I don't want to fight a war where my own generals are shooting at me from behind.
Prior to 1/6 it wasn't certain that the right's generals would be shooting at their own troops. Now it is. Which is why a lot of the wind was knocked out of the right. Now comes the long journey of "find generals who won't shoot at us"
Funny, thats how I feel about dense motherfuckers like you. Go start something, see where it gets you, moron.
What are you talking about?