J&J is a traditional vaccine, not mRNA therapy. However traditional coronavirus vaccines are noted for having worse side effects and were completely avoided before Covid because the harm outweighs the benefits. The problem here is every vaccine before now was planned on needing boosters and do not need continuous boosters. What we are referring to as “boosters” now are unheard of in any medical literature. It’s booster as we go instead of spacing out shots intentionally to guarantee efficacy.
Hold on, it is NOT a traditional vaccine. They ADVERTISE it as a 'traditional' vaccine because of only one shot, but it is actually far more dangerous then the others, which is why it is banned in many states and countries around the world.
It uses a different, also untested technology that differs from mRNA but is actually even less researched.
I had no idea it wasn't a two-shot vaccine to begin with.
But seeing as the other ones now require a third shot, doesn't it still put J&J ahead of the other ones?
J&J is a traditional vaccine, not mRNA therapy. However traditional coronavirus vaccines are noted for having worse side effects and were completely avoided before Covid because the harm outweighs the benefits. The problem here is every vaccine before now was planned on needing boosters and do not need continuous boosters. What we are referring to as “boosters” now are unheard of in any medical literature. It’s booster as we go instead of spacing out shots intentionally to guarantee efficacy.
Hold on, it is NOT a traditional vaccine. They ADVERTISE it as a 'traditional' vaccine because of only one shot, but it is actually far more dangerous then the others, which is why it is banned in many states and countries around the world.
It uses a different, also untested technology that differs from mRNA but is actually even less researched.
Sorry, traditional coronavirus vaccine. It is the same methodology as the failed MERS and SARS coronavirus vaccines.