They would be following behind China in their attempt to raise birth rates.
It's almost like they see some kind of massive collapse on the horizon and are trying to legally fortify positions to ensure their people maintain growth and proper family units.
Lots of Russian women are quite beautiful, so it should be easy to pair them up with the men. I'm not really sure what the mindset is of most Russian women, though, whether they resent their femininity and the role of the female in a nuclear family like Western women do or if they're more traditional.
I'm of two minds on this. Stripping away freedoms to enforce strong birth rates and families can actually lead to disruptions and rebellion... unless people actually want to be together and responsibly raise families with a significant other. Then it's compelling people to do what they already desire.
On the other hand, I can see how something like this is useful to safeguard their society against the globohomo agenda. Hungary, Poland, and China also know how dangerous the Rainbow Reich is and how it can completely disrupt and destroy not just current societies but entire generational lineages. All brought to cessation due to hedonistic homosexuality.
For some things I think hard-line stances are necessary when you see the dangers racing toward you, sort of like the immigration invasion plaguing America and other first-world nations. Mitigating the danger is the right response.
If the psychological health of the people aren't negatively impacted with these policies, then it's not a bad thing. It prevents the Rainbow Reich from establishing a foothold anywhere in the country, and also encourages men to raise families and for women to be help-meets. So long as they don't have to deal with Jewish-ran/CCP-funded Cultural Marxism invading the sociopolitical or academic scene, their plan just might work.
They would be following behind China in their attempt to raise birth rates.
This is what I thought. If it happens, its for the same reasons that China is doing what it has been doing. China isnt banning video games, gay stuff, and all the other things its been banning because its suddenly "based" or for some grand scheme. Its because their absolute midwit smoothbrain leaders kneecapped their own population advantage because for some reason no one in the elite is able to figure out that Malthus was a hack.
Not only does his theory not account for changes in growth rates because things will naturally adapt to fit their environments (I would personally argue the reason you have seen so much slow down in national growth rates is a natural realignment due to many nations being overcrowded).
Not only does it not account for increased productivity that can fix the issue that is being shown (See: Green Revolution, and the rumors here in farm country is we are about to have another revolution in farming).
You want to know the event that Malthus used as the basis for his theory that there is an upper limit to population and you need to do all of the extreme control on it? The Irish Potato Famine. You know, one of the most infamous man-made famines in history! Ireland made enough cereal crops to weather what was happening. It would have sucked, but they could have made it through without the potatoes. Except that then the English came in and said "Ours now" and took all of their own crops to distribute it back to them in amounts not nearly high enough. And this is the entire basis for his theory.
He is about on par with Lysenko as far as "smart scientist" go.
Interesting if true.
They would be following behind China in their attempt to raise birth rates.
It's almost like they see some kind of massive collapse on the horizon and are trying to legally fortify positions to ensure their people maintain growth and proper family units.
Lots of Russian women are quite beautiful, so it should be easy to pair them up with the men. I'm not really sure what the mindset is of most Russian women, though, whether they resent their femininity and the role of the female in a nuclear family like Western women do or if they're more traditional.
I'm of two minds on this. Stripping away freedoms to enforce strong birth rates and families can actually lead to disruptions and rebellion... unless people actually want to be together and responsibly raise families with a significant other. Then it's compelling people to do what they already desire.
On the other hand, I can see how something like this is useful to safeguard their society against the globohomo agenda. Hungary, Poland, and China also know how dangerous the Rainbow Reich is and how it can completely disrupt and destroy not just current societies but entire generational lineages. All brought to cessation due to hedonistic homosexuality.
For some things I think hard-line stances are necessary when you see the dangers racing toward you, sort of like the immigration invasion plaguing America and other first-world nations. Mitigating the danger is the right response.
If the psychological health of the people aren't negatively impacted with these policies, then it's not a bad thing. It prevents the Rainbow Reich from establishing a foothold anywhere in the country, and also encourages men to raise families and for women to be help-meets. So long as they don't have to deal with Jewish-ran/CCP-funded Cultural Marxism invading the sociopolitical or academic scene, their plan just might work.
It's certainly worth keeping an eye on.
This is what I thought. If it happens, its for the same reasons that China is doing what it has been doing. China isnt banning video games, gay stuff, and all the other things its been banning because its suddenly "based" or for some grand scheme. Its because their absolute midwit smoothbrain leaders kneecapped their own population advantage because for some reason no one in the elite is able to figure out that Malthus was a hack.
Pretty much totally ignored human creativity.
Its hackery all the way down though.
Not only does his theory not account for changes in growth rates because things will naturally adapt to fit their environments (I would personally argue the reason you have seen so much slow down in national growth rates is a natural realignment due to many nations being overcrowded).
Not only does it not account for increased productivity that can fix the issue that is being shown (See: Green Revolution, and the rumors here in farm country is we are about to have another revolution in farming).
You want to know the event that Malthus used as the basis for his theory that there is an upper limit to population and you need to do all of the extreme control on it? The Irish Potato Famine. You know, one of the most infamous man-made famines in history! Ireland made enough cereal crops to weather what was happening. It would have sucked, but they could have made it through without the potatoes. Except that then the English came in and said "Ours now" and took all of their own crops to distribute it back to them in amounts not nearly high enough. And this is the entire basis for his theory.
He is about on par with Lysenko as far as "smart scientist" go.