This is just another example of how studies by "experts" are only for reinforcing the left's narrative, and not learning about the world. The subtitle asks this question:
For years, the leading experts have testified that prone restraint by police is safe. So why do people keep dying?
Well, the martyrdom of Saint George of Fentanyl via an overdose of narcotics he swallowed to avoid a drug charge provides a pretty strong clue, or it would if propaganda rags like NYT hadn't spent the past 17 months trying to cover that up.
We are living in a post-truth society, and it is destroying the ability of those who engage with it to think. This can only be continued for so long before a complete collapse of the system, either due to insufficient continued support from the remaining thinking men, or "success" resulting in the complete inability of anyone outside the elite to make the correct decisions, resulting in the inevitable economic collapse of the resulting strict command economy as those still able to make decisions are unable to assimilate enough information to make those decisions accurately. AI won't save them from the reality that distributed price determination (free exchange, free association, and free speech) is the only viable method to support an advanced economy. Anything else results in a severe information deficit compounded by a complete inability to process what information is available to direct the economy.
That research may be based on science. That's not worth the website it's published on. They need the official answer from The Science™ to know what to do. It's based on political views. If you are of the approved opinion, the officer shall kneel, apologize, and take abuse from the suspect oppressed until they get bored and leave. If of an unapproved opinion, the officer shall restrain the suspect terrorist by using a two hands around the neck maneuver in a manner that will choke the terrorist.
This is just another example of how studies by "experts" are only for reinforcing the left's narrative, and not learning about the world. The subtitle asks this question:
Well, the martyrdom of Saint George of Fentanyl via an overdose of narcotics he swallowed to avoid a drug charge provides a pretty strong clue, or it would if propaganda rags like NYT hadn't spent the past 17 months trying to cover that up.
Trust the experts bigot!
We are living in a post-truth society, and it is destroying the ability of those who engage with it to think. This can only be continued for so long before a complete collapse of the system, either due to insufficient continued support from the remaining thinking men, or "success" resulting in the complete inability of anyone outside the elite to make the correct decisions, resulting in the inevitable economic collapse of the resulting strict command economy as those still able to make decisions are unable to assimilate enough information to make those decisions accurately. AI won't save them from the reality that distributed price determination (free exchange, free association, and free speech) is the only viable method to support an advanced economy. Anything else results in a severe information deficit compounded by a complete inability to process what information is available to direct the economy.
That research may be based on science. That's not worth the website it's published on. They need the official answer from The Science™ to know what to do. It's based on political views. If you are of the approved opinion, the officer shall kneel, apologize, and take abuse from the
suspectoppressed until they get bored and leave. If of an unapproved opinion, the officer shall restrain thesuspectterrorist by using a two hands around the neck maneuver in a manner that will choke the terrorist.Follow the Science™!
No, not that science! Follow The Science™ the agrees with my preconceptions!