So here is the source. According to this document, seven people died after receiving the vaccine, but the connection with the vaccine is by no means certain.
Actually, I have seen a CDC PDF with breakdowns like that one. The numbers claimed by the CDC are about 1/10 of what your image shows. 170 out of 1 million is about a 0.017% chance of getting myocarditis, which I'm not at all sure is worth cutting the risk of death/hospitalization for the coronavirus.
But the numbers of death and injury are quit disappointing innit? Apparently, women can't even properly create a vaccine intended to kill men. They really should get some men to do that for them.
But the numbers of death and injury are quite disappointing innit Apparently, women can't even properly create a vaccine intended to kill men. They really should get some men to do that for them.
173.1 per million after two doses as per official data.
What we don't know is how much the data is massaged.
For what group? Where are you getting this official data?
https://media.kotakuinaction2.win/post/2XQdEFxU.jpeg
Ontario, Canada. Wish I could find something more relevant, but the US only uses VAERS and it doesn't seem to provide breakdowns like this.
So here is the source. According to this document, seven people died after receiving the vaccine, but the connection with the vaccine is by no means certain.
Actually, I have seen a CDC PDF with breakdowns like that one. The numbers claimed by the CDC are about 1/10 of what your image shows. 170 out of 1 million is about a 0.017% chance of getting myocarditis, which I'm not at all sure is worth cutting the risk of death/hospitalization for the coronavirus.
But the numbers of death and injury are quit disappointing innit? Apparently, women can't even properly create a vaccine intended to kill men. They really should get some men to do that for them.
What are the boosters for?
Whats the rate for under 40s prevacc?