Lots of men in political power fucking the populace at large as well.
Don't fall into that retard's well of dumbass shittery and [[[noticing]]] things.
It's not a men v women, black v white, jew vs gentile, etc. thing. It's just class warfare, a tale as old as human civilization. The aristocrat-equivalent class has always sought out to gain greater power (social, gubernatorial, religious, economic, etc.) at the expense of the average citizen. We just see it more clearly now that every peasant imagines himself a minor lordling owed recognition and protection under the agreements of the aristocracy.
Which is why we shouldn’t support women in these roles, because they are put in place by those people to be manipulated. ‘Female leader’ Is an oxymoron. For practical purposes, there is no such thing.
Women on the whole cannot separate decision making from the need for approval. Its biological imperative. History clearly demonstrates this ad infinitum.
Impossible1 is missing but why is it always women.
Lots of men in political power fucking the populace at large as well.
Don't fall into that retard's well of dumbass shittery and [[[noticing]]] things.
It's not a men v women, black v white, jew vs gentile, etc. thing. It's just class warfare, a tale as old as human civilization. The aristocrat-equivalent class has always sought out to gain greater power (social, gubernatorial, religious, economic, etc.) at the expense of the average citizen. We just see it more clearly now that every peasant imagines himself a minor lordling owed recognition and protection under the agreements of the aristocracy.
Which is why we shouldn’t support women in these roles, because they are put in place by those people to be manipulated. ‘Female leader’ Is an oxymoron. For practical purposes, there is no such thing.
Women on the whole cannot separate decision making from the need for approval. Its biological imperative. History clearly demonstrates this ad infinitum.