"Winston had disliked her from the very first moment of seeing her. He knew the reason. It was because of the atmosphere of hockey−fields and cold baths and community hikes and general clean−mindedness which she managed to carry about with her. He disliked nearly all women, and especially the young and pretty ones. It was always the women, and above all the young ones, who were the most bigoted adherents of the Party, the swallowers of slogans, the amateur spies and nosers−out of unorthodoxy."
No, they really consider it an instruction manual. I'm not 100% sure it wasn't intended that way by Orwell either. (even though he claimed to despise totalitarians)
An idpol-obsessed marxist would read that paragraph as a condemnation of Winston. He almost sounds like Patrick Bateman there.
They know that barely anyone reads it, and barely anyone knows what's in it, so for now they're trying to reverse the content and make people think that the message of 1984 is "trust the authorities and support the community," when in fact it is the opposite.
This may or may not work. It depends on how successfully they can reframe the book and on how strong peoples' confirmation bias can be. Is bias really strong enough to make people extract the opposite message from a book, even when they've read it, just because they've been primed to see something that isn't there? Who knows.
If reframing the book doesn't work, then they'll try to ban it on a larger scale. Right now it's just small splinter groups trying to ban it, and the authorities are either pretending it doesn't exist, or reversing the meaning of it.
"Winston had disliked her from the very first moment of seeing her. He knew the reason. It was because of the atmosphere of hockey−fields and cold baths and community hikes and general clean−mindedness which she managed to carry about with her. He disliked nearly all women, and especially the young and pretty ones. It was always the women, and above all the young ones, who were the most bigoted adherents of the Party, the swallowers of slogans, the amateur spies and nosers−out of unorthodoxy."
So that's why they want 1984 banned.
Do they really?
No, they really consider it an instruction manual. I'm not 100% sure it wasn't intended that way by Orwell either. (even though he claimed to despise totalitarians)
An idpol-obsessed marxist would read that paragraph as a condemnation of Winston. He almost sounds like Patrick Bateman there.
They know that barely anyone reads it, and barely anyone knows what's in it, so for now they're trying to reverse the content and make people think that the message of 1984 is "trust the authorities and support the community," when in fact it is the opposite.
This may or may not work. It depends on how successfully they can reframe the book and on how strong peoples' confirmation bias can be. Is bias really strong enough to make people extract the opposite message from a book, even when they've read it, just because they've been primed to see something that isn't there? Who knows.
If reframing the book doesn't work, then they'll try to ban it on a larger scale. Right now it's just small splinter groups trying to ban it, and the authorities are either pretending it doesn't exist, or reversing the meaning of it.
How anyone can live through the last 3/4 years and not be "sexist" is beyond me.
People being "gross icky meanie poopyheads" in a dystopia? How dare they!