Under the same laws that prevent employers from charging you for equipment they are supposed to be supplying you with for safety. I know of no employer that charges you the price to take required drug tests for employment.
They wont be spending, but they will be losing lots and lots of money.
You have forgot about the silent majority. A General Strike is already being broadcasted. The government wants to fuck with business to fuck with The People, we push back on the businesses, then they go at gov with lawyers. Gov loses because their mandate has no Constitutional muster. Hence, dump the responsibility onto OSHA, so when it all backfires, those in OSHA are holding the bag of evil. If OSHA is not evil, they will take the administration to task at the SCOTUS. If OSHA acts anti-Constitutional in their protocol(s), everyone in the country, business and people, lose their prosperity and livelihoods. No one, nobody, will be safe when the money stops flowing.
Remember, these people in these administrative positions are already supposed to know the detriment that comes from such policy.. So they are either ignoring it to see how far they can go, or they are dumb AF. I just don't think the later is possible.
We are currently playing a game of Chicken with Big Business. We won't have jobs, and they won't have enough employees to function.
Big Business is betting that the bailouts and loans they will get from the government will keep them afloat long enough to outlast us. They are hoping that we will "blink" first and starve before they become insolvent.
Employers won't have to spend a dime.
Email: " u vaxxd bro?"
if yes: "great, send us your card woth serial number and you're all set"
if no: "get tested on your dime or its the boot"
They can't force the employee to pay for the testing without being put at risk for a civil lawsuit.
Courts: "unvaxxed get fucked"
The federal government can't make this kind of broad mandate without opening itself up to lawsuits, yet here we are.
Actually several courts have ruled against various lockdown measures in the past year. So the odds are in your favor when taking this to the courts.
Under the same laws that prevent employers from charging you for equipment they are supposed to be supplying you with for safety. I know of no employer that charges you the price to take required drug tests for employment.
They wont be spending, but they will be losing lots and lots of money.
You have forgot about the silent majority. A General Strike is already being broadcasted. The government wants to fuck with business to fuck with The People, we push back on the businesses, then they go at gov with lawyers. Gov loses because their mandate has no Constitutional muster. Hence, dump the responsibility onto OSHA, so when it all backfires, those in OSHA are holding the bag of evil. If OSHA is not evil, they will take the administration to task at the SCOTUS. If OSHA acts anti-Constitutional in their protocol(s), everyone in the country, business and people, lose their prosperity and livelihoods. No one, nobody, will be safe when the money stops flowing.
Remember, these people in these administrative positions are already supposed to know the detriment that comes from such policy.. So they are either ignoring it to see how far they can go, or they are dumb AF. I just don't think the later is possible.
We are currently playing a game of Chicken with Big Business. We won't have jobs, and they won't have enough employees to function.
Big Business is betting that the bailouts and loans they will get from the government will keep them afloat long enough to outlast us. They are hoping that we will "blink" first and starve before they become insolvent.
It is our responsibility to prove them wrong.