Shocker.
Just wait, by January first it will be 4.
The only thing this is going to do is cause ADE, which means a lifetime of booster shots because people's immune systems will be completely destroyed.
if they don't die from a simple common cold that is.
I'm just going to copy and paste some info I wrote in another thread for anyone who may be curious.
Do you know who the most vaccine hesitant group is right now?
The Answer: Those with PhD's.
So people calling out "anti-vaxxers" as retards, is, well, pretty retarded, honestly.
Do the vaccines for Covid prevent transmission?
The Answer: No. They do not prevent transmission. These vaccines were never designed to prevent transmission.
In fact, as far as current studies are showing, those who have been vaccinated have the same viral load -- and in some cases even more -- than those who are not vaccinated. Meaning they're just as likely, if not more so to spread Covid than someone who is not vaccinated.
You'll hear people say: "The vaccine is 95% effective in stopping Covid!"
Sorry, but that is factually incorrect.
The 95% is not the effectiveness in preventing someone from getting effected. The 95% is how much the vaccine attenuates the virus itself. Meaning, how much it reduces the impact on a person.
Given we've been seeing with Delta, it doesn't even seem to be doing that very well, honestly. Studies from Public Health England are currently showing that the vaccinated are currently experiencing more severe symptoms from Delta. That sucks, huh? If only that were the worst of it.
CDC Director Rochelle Walensky is even on record as saying that these vaccines have no ability to prevent infection by, or transmission of, the Delta variant.
Recently, In the US, it was revealed that both Moderna and Pfizer are being investigated because their vaccines seem to be having adverse reactions in young adults, causing severe heart inflammation.
In Europe, Moderna was pulled from being used because it was being linked to blood clots and stroke, because the vaccine is leaky.
Before, I continue on, I'm sure some people will ask "what does "leaking" mean. (not to be confused with leaky, causing Marek's disease. Although we'll learn more later on that) I keep hearing that."
Well, when you get these vaccines, they're supposed to jab you in the shoulder, and the vaccine is supposed to be absorbed into the muscle, where it will very slowly be distributed to the body and help fight off the virus.
What's happening, though, is that the vaccine isn't staying in the muscle at all. It's leaking into the bloodstream. The spike proteins present in the vaccine present a very serious risk to people and can cause very bad blood clots and strokes. This is even more dangerous if it were to occur somewhere like the brain.
Which leads me to my next point. A study out of Japan a couple weeks ago shows that the vaccine is depositing massive amounts of spike proteins into the reproductive system of women. Essentially, the proteins are settling into their ovaries, which can cause miscarriages and potentially even the inability to give birth at all due to reproductive track damage. The results of what the consequences of this are currently unknown and are still being studied further.
Fun Fact: In 1976, there was a Swine Flue epidemic in America. Big Pharma quickly rushed to get a vaccine to market. Once they began distributing the vaccine, a handful of people died from it. In response to the vaccine potentially causing harm to people, it was quickly pulled from use and banned in several states.
As of the date of FDA "approval," there have been 1,517,211 maimed/injured and 9,027 deaths following the Pfizer vaccines recorded in the U.S. Government’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS).
One thing worrying everyone currently is what the long-term ramifications of these new experimental vaccines are. While we certainly have almost no idea what they might be at the moment, a new study recently released in the Journal of Infection appears to provide solid evidence that the Covid injections being administered around the world will, without question, cause ADE (Antibody Dependency Enhancement) effects in people when they are exposed to the Delta variant or potentially other coronavirus strains. This alone should cause the entire medicine world to take a step back and reconsider the approach currently being taken. Unless people like the prospect of having a busted immune system that's reliant on boosters forever?
There's so much more to go through, but I have a cold (yes, they still exist, just don't tell the gestapo or they'll label me Covid) so I'm going stop here.
I suppose I could mention how the pharmaceutical companies are completely absolved of any liability,but everyone should know that. It's also worth mentioning that since the rollout of these vaccines, they're also making an obscene amount of money. So it's not unexpected that they can lobby to keep information tightly sealed from ever reaching the public and continue to push for people to get the jab.
I'll also say that recently tens of thousands of people who volunteered to be in studies of the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines are still participating in follow-up research. But some key questions won't be easily answered, because many people who had been in the placebo group have have been given vaccines by the pharma companies. Congratulations to them on screwing that up massively.
That said, it's everyone's personal responsibility to educate themselves on anything that they want to pretend is important to them.
ADE is Antibody Dependency Enhancement.
It's when antibodies which are created by the immune system during an infection bind with a virus, but essentially don't do anything. Instead, they act as a sort of Trojan, allowing the virus to get into cells and trigger a more severe immune response.
Basically, the virus becomes much more severe in a person who has already been exposed to it, by previous infection or vaccine, because their antibodies aren't really doing anything except binding to the virus and triggering a more sever reaction in the immune system.
I remember in the Weinstein podcast with Malone, Malone said this is what he was worried about originally and decided it wasn’t a concern. So, we now know it is?
A concern? Yeah.
Is it guaranteed to happen?
Nope. But it's hard to say at this point. Some scientists say it's very likely.
Here's a recent study released with regards to ADE.
So the risk is present, and with every variant it technically increases. What's also interesting is with Delta we're noticing that people who are vaccinated are displaying more severe symptoms and they also have similar -- and sometimes more -- viral loads than those who aren't. That said, there are definitely no guarantees.
Personally, I prefer to be cautious because there's enough other issues with the vaccine and since the Pharma companies aren't held liable in any way, I'm sure as hell not going to trust them. You know how many times they've been caught lying?
What really bothers me is that any information that these authoritarian assholes find inconvenient is being censored and obscured. I think people should have the right to know that to date over 1 million people have been maimed/injured by the vaccine, and almost 10,000 (that are actually reported) have died from it.
There's a very real reason that we never made a vaccine for corona virus's (before Covid Corona was also known as the common cold) in the past. The chances for mutation and much stronger variants of the cold were exceedingly high, and creating vaccines for it came with the risk of ADE.
I'm not on board with your "leaky" part. From what I've read, "leaky" refers to whether a vaccine prevents the patient from spreading the virus; if it doesn't, then the virus may mutate to become more deadly to people who haven't received the treatment, since there is less evolutionary pressure on it to reduce symptom severity. This is known as Marek's Syndrome.
It's Mareks disease, not Marks -- And I'm speaking about the colloquial term that people are using for the vaccine leaking into the bloodstream from the muscle, not the virologist term. Although I can definitely see how the two can easily get mixed, it's not like most people are virologists, so it's not unexpected. In the context I've been seeing most people discussing, this is what they're referring to, since the Covid vaccines were never designed to stop the spread of the virus to begin with. I think it's just a coincidence or people misusing the term in general. Perhaps it's y fault for not thinking of a better word. I'm not sure what else it should be called when a vaccine that's meant to stay in the muscle leaks into the bloodstream. I'm sure there's a synonym that can work, but my brain is not working right now. Medicine and fever got my cloudy. Maybe I'll just change it to leaking?
But yes, in most regards you are correct. Although it's yet to be seen, it is also possible that these vaccines could currently very likely to be proliferating the evolution of the virus and could be leaky in that traditional sense as well. hard to say at the moment.
I'll update it all later. Too wiped out right now.
Sorry, I had an autocorrect on Marek's that I didn't notice.
It was my understanding that vaccines were generally injected into the muscle so that they wouldn't immediately spread through the body, slowing the infection; but the expectation isn't that nothing from the injection would ever enter the bloodstream. Every cell in the body is a maximum of what, 10 cells away from a blood vessel? It's not so much about preventing the virus from ever reaching the bloodstream as making sure the immune response begins before the injection makes substantial contact with central systems.
I don't remember where I learned that, though, so I'm interested in sources either way.
That's literally what I said in my first post.
However, the original expectations were that the vaccines would be like “traditional” vaccines and the spike protein in the vaxx -- which in Covid cases is what causes infection and most severe symptoms -- would remain mostly in the injection site in the shoulder. Instead, a couple studies show that the spike protein gets into the blood where it circulates for several days after, then accumulates in organs.
Originally, when creating the vaxx, the developers chose the spike protein because they believed it to be a good antigen. As development continued, so did our understanding of the virus itself. Numerous studies has shown that the most severe effects of Covid, such as blood clotting and bleeding, are due to the effects of the spike protein of the virus itself. It wasn't until later they discovered that the spike protein itself was a pathogenic protein -- it's a toxin. So vaccinations may very well be be injecting said toxin into people.
It's important to remember that the speculations of the dangers surrounding the spike protein are only offering a plausible explanation to what we already know. That's many people are currently being effecting by severe reactions to the vaccine. Currently, the entire "counter-claim" comes from duplicitous people who appear to be towing the line, and they refute the claims not by saying they're false, but rather, by simply saying: "The studies never said they were harmful!" or "it's an assumption that if the viral spike protein can cause damage, then the spike protein generated in vaccinated people does the same." Yeah, no shit. That's why it's being noted as a plausible explanation, because what we are undeniably seeing is the vaccine being associated with increased blot clots, strokes, and heart inflammation. These people seem more concerned with pushing their agenda than actually doing real science to discover if it's a possibility.
Furthermore, the same people refuting it are also the ones who are screaming masks and lockdowns are effective, They also disingenuously treat Covid like it's the damn black plague and ignore how inflated the death numbers are due to the CDC changes, and more-or-less attempt to silence literally anyone who doesn't conform with the the narrative. Saying that something is supposed to work in a certain way is not the same as it actually doing just that.
The claim that "the clinical relevance of this finding is unknown and should be further explored" is ridiculous as well. How many people will have to by maim/injured/killed in the meantime? How can these same people be advocating for vaccine mandates while simultaneously spewing nonsense like that?
To put it another way, they want people to participate based on "good faith." But can anyone tell me what they've done to earn the trust of people for the people to have faith in them?
If anything, their actions have not only been antithetical to science -- which is founding on being able to ask any questions you want and to have healthy debates about critical issues -- but they've also been taking a very authoritarian approach to all of this since day one, while completely ignoring any science that came before, and anything they don't want to believe now.
To further illustrate my point, in my first post, I elucidated that there have been 1,517,211 maimed/injured and 9,027 deaths following the vaccines recorded in the U.S. Government’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), right?
To any sane person, that should be a huge red flag. Period.
But, it's actually not the worst of it, because that same VAERS report is also being wildly under-reported.
According to a study done back in 2010, before Covid, by Harvard (commissioned by our own government), less than 1% of all adverse reactions to vaccines are actually submitted to VAERS.
To date, the issues with the VAERS report still have not been fixed either.
Let that sink in. So if those numbers above are only representative of <1%, what the hell would the actual statistics look like?
As a fun side-note, the VAERS report also doesn't include the thousands of people being effected by Bell's Palsy.
But you don't hear about any of this on the news either, huh? Social media and big tech almost damn sure that anyone bringing such questions up immediately gets silenced and then the boot as well.
Anyway, I have zero problem if you or anyone else want to take the vaccine. Be my guest. I'm not trying to force you into not getting it or taking my position. The only purpose of my posts is to show why people are hesitant, myself included, and why I have no plan on taking the jab at all. There may very well be things that I end up being wrong about -- and I'm perfectly ok with that. Because it's still important that those things are answered or investigated.
As I said in my first post, it's completely up to you to keep yourself informed and to form your own views on it.
My biggest problem is the people who are getting vaccinated trying to force those who are not, while simultaneously being completely ignorant and simply parroting whatever TV, social media, or celebrities, tell them.
Best of luck to you, man.
Shocker.
Just wait, by January first it will be 4.
The only thing this is going to do is cause ADE, which means a lifetime of booster shots because people's immune systems will be completely destroyed.
if they don't die from a simple common cold that is.
I'm just going to copy and paste some info I wrote in another thread for anyone who may be curious.
Do you know who the most vaccine hesitant group is right now? The Answer: Those with PhD's. So people calling out "anti-vaxxers" as retards, is, well, pretty retarded, honestly.
Do the vaccines for Covid prevent transmission? The Answer: No. They do not prevent transmission. These vaccines were never designed to prevent transmission. In fact, as far as current studies are showing, those who have been vaccinated have the same viral load -- and in some cases even more -- than those who are not vaccinated. Meaning they're just as likely, if not more so to spread Covid than someone who is not vaccinated.
You'll hear people say: "The vaccine is 95% effective in stopping Covid!" Sorry, but that is factually incorrect. The 95% is not the effectiveness in preventing someone from getting effected. The 95% is how much the vaccine attenuates the virus itself. Meaning, how much it reduces the impact on a person. Given we've been seeing with Delta, it doesn't even seem to be doing that very well, honestly. Studies from Public Health England are currently showing that the vaccinated are currently experiencing more severe symptoms from Delta. That sucks, huh? If only that were the worst of it. CDC Director Rochelle Walensky is even on record as saying that these vaccines have no ability to prevent infection by, or transmission of, the Delta variant.
Recently, In the US, it was revealed that both Moderna and Pfizer are being investigated because their vaccines seem to be having adverse reactions in young adults, causing severe heart inflammation. In Europe, Moderna was pulled from being used because it was being linked to blood clots and stroke, because the vaccine is leaky.
Before, I continue on, I'm sure some people will ask "what does "leaking" mean. (not to be confused with leaky, causing Marek's disease. Although we'll learn more later on that) I keep hearing that." Well, when you get these vaccines, they're supposed to jab you in the shoulder, and the vaccine is supposed to be absorbed into the muscle, where it will very slowly be distributed to the body and help fight off the virus. What's happening, though, is that the vaccine isn't staying in the muscle at all. It's leaking into the bloodstream. The spike proteins present in the vaccine present a very serious risk to people and can cause very bad blood clots and strokes. This is even more dangerous if it were to occur somewhere like the brain.
Which leads me to my next point. A study out of Japan a couple weeks ago shows that the vaccine is depositing massive amounts of spike proteins into the reproductive system of women. Essentially, the proteins are settling into their ovaries, which can cause miscarriages and potentially even the inability to give birth at all due to reproductive track damage. The results of what the consequences of this are currently unknown and are still being studied further.
Fun Fact: In 1976, there was a Swine Flue epidemic in America. Big Pharma quickly rushed to get a vaccine to market. Once they began distributing the vaccine, a handful of people died from it. In response to the vaccine potentially causing harm to people, it was quickly pulled from use and banned in several states.
As of the date of FDA "approval," there have been 1,517,211 maimed/injured and 9,027 deaths following the Pfizer vaccines recorded in the U.S. Government’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS).
One thing worrying everyone currently is what the long-term ramifications of these new experimental vaccines are. While we certainly have almost no idea what they might be at the moment, a new study recently released in the Journal of Infection appears to provide solid evidence that the Covid injections being administered around the world will, without question, cause ADE (Antibody Dependency Enhancement) effects in people when they are exposed to the Delta variant or potentially other coronavirus strains. This alone should cause the entire medicine world to take a step back and reconsider the approach currently being taken. Unless people like the prospect of having a busted immune system that's reliant on boosters forever?
There's so much more to go through, but I have a cold (yes, they still exist, just don't tell the gestapo or they'll label me Covid) so I'm going stop here.
I suppose I could mention how the pharmaceutical companies are completely absolved of any liability,but everyone should know that. It's also worth mentioning that since the rollout of these vaccines, they're also making an obscene amount of money. So it's not unexpected that they can lobby to keep information tightly sealed from ever reaching the public and continue to push for people to get the jab.
I'll also say that recently tens of thousands of people who volunteered to be in studies of the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines are still participating in follow-up research. But some key questions won't be easily answered, because many people who had been in the placebo group have have been given vaccines by the pharma companies. Congratulations to them on screwing that up massively.
That said, it's everyone's personal responsibility to educate themselves on anything that they want to pretend is important to them.
The rich are VERY interested in this, yes.
What’s ADE?
ADE is Antibody Dependency Enhancement.
It's when antibodies which are created by the immune system during an infection bind with a virus, but essentially don't do anything. Instead, they act as a sort of Trojan, allowing the virus to get into cells and trigger a more severe immune response. Basically, the virus becomes much more severe in a person who has already been exposed to it, by previous infection or vaccine, because their antibodies aren't really doing anything except binding to the virus and triggering a more sever reaction in the immune system.
I remember in the Weinstein podcast with Malone, Malone said this is what he was worried about originally and decided it wasn’t a concern. So, we now know it is?
A concern? Yeah. Is it guaranteed to happen?
Nope. But it's hard to say at this point. Some scientists say it's very likely.
Here's a recent study released with regards to ADE.
https://www.journalofinfection.com/article/S0163-4453(21)00392-3/fulltext
Here's a good read that breaks things down a bit, if you're interested:
https://alethonews.com/2021/04/18/is-a-coronavirus-vaccine-a-ticking-time-bomb/
Basically, the concern is more for variants.
Here's an article from a French virologist and Nobel Prize winner discussing some concerns.
https://rightsfreedoms.wordpress.com/2021/05/24/bombshell-nobel-prize-winner-reveals-covid-vaccine-is-creating-variants/
So the risk is present, and with every variant it technically increases. What's also interesting is with Delta we're noticing that people who are vaccinated are displaying more severe symptoms and they also have similar -- and sometimes more -- viral loads than those who aren't. That said, there are definitely no guarantees. Personally, I prefer to be cautious because there's enough other issues with the vaccine and since the Pharma companies aren't held liable in any way, I'm sure as hell not going to trust them. You know how many times they've been caught lying?
What really bothers me is that any information that these authoritarian assholes find inconvenient is being censored and obscured. I think people should have the right to know that to date over 1 million people have been maimed/injured by the vaccine, and almost 10,000 (that are actually reported) have died from it.
There's a very real reason that we never made a vaccine for corona virus's (before Covid Corona was also known as the common cold) in the past. The chances for mutation and much stronger variants of the cold were exceedingly high, and creating vaccines for it came with the risk of ADE.
I'm not on board with your "leaky" part. From what I've read, "leaky" refers to whether a vaccine prevents the patient from spreading the virus; if it doesn't, then the virus may mutate to become more deadly to people who haven't received the treatment, since there is less evolutionary pressure on it to reduce symptom severity. This is known as Marek's Syndrome.
It's Mareks disease, not Marks -- And I'm speaking about the colloquial term that people are using for the vaccine leaking into the bloodstream from the muscle, not the virologist term. Although I can definitely see how the two can easily get mixed, it's not like most people are virologists, so it's not unexpected. In the context I've been seeing most people discussing, this is what they're referring to, since the Covid vaccines were never designed to stop the spread of the virus to begin with. I think it's just a coincidence or people misusing the term in general. Perhaps it's y fault for not thinking of a better word. I'm not sure what else it should be called when a vaccine that's meant to stay in the muscle leaks into the bloodstream. I'm sure there's a synonym that can work, but my brain is not working right now. Medicine and fever got my cloudy. Maybe I'll just change it to leaking? But yes, in most regards you are correct. Although it's yet to be seen, it is also possible that these vaccines could currently very likely to be proliferating the evolution of the virus and could be leaky in that traditional sense as well. hard to say at the moment. I'll update it all later. Too wiped out right now.
Sorry, I had an autocorrect on Marek's that I didn't notice.
It was my understanding that vaccines were generally injected into the muscle so that they wouldn't immediately spread through the body, slowing the infection; but the expectation isn't that nothing from the injection would ever enter the bloodstream. Every cell in the body is a maximum of what, 10 cells away from a blood vessel? It's not so much about preventing the virus from ever reaching the bloodstream as making sure the immune response begins before the injection makes substantial contact with central systems.
I don't remember where I learned that, though, so I'm interested in sources either way.
That's literally what I said in my first post.
However, the original expectations were that the vaccines would be like “traditional” vaccines and the spike protein in the vaxx -- which in Covid cases is what causes infection and most severe symptoms -- would remain mostly in the injection site in the shoulder. Instead, a couple studies show that the spike protein gets into the blood where it circulates for several days after, then accumulates in organs.
Originally, when creating the vaxx, the developers chose the spike protein because they believed it to be a good antigen. As development continued, so did our understanding of the virus itself. Numerous studies has shown that the most severe effects of Covid, such as blood clotting and bleeding, are due to the effects of the spike protein of the virus itself. It wasn't until later they discovered that the spike protein itself was a pathogenic protein -- it's a toxin. So vaccinations may very well be be injecting said toxin into people.
It's important to remember that the speculations of the dangers surrounding the spike protein are only offering a plausible explanation to what we already know. That's many people are currently being effecting by severe reactions to the vaccine. Currently, the entire "counter-claim" comes from duplicitous people who appear to be towing the line, and they refute the claims not by saying they're false, but rather, by simply saying: "The studies never said they were harmful!" or "it's an assumption that if the viral spike protein can cause damage, then the spike protein generated in vaccinated people does the same." Yeah, no shit. That's why it's being noted as a plausible explanation, because what we are undeniably seeing is the vaccine being associated with increased blot clots, strokes, and heart inflammation. These people seem more concerned with pushing their agenda than actually doing real science to discover if it's a possibility.
Furthermore, the same people refuting it are also the ones who are screaming masks and lockdowns are effective, They also disingenuously treat Covid like it's the damn black plague and ignore how inflated the death numbers are due to the CDC changes, and more-or-less attempt to silence literally anyone who doesn't conform with the the narrative. Saying that something is supposed to work in a certain way is not the same as it actually doing just that.
The claim that "the clinical relevance of this finding is unknown and should be further explored" is ridiculous as well. How many people will have to by maim/injured/killed in the meantime? How can these same people be advocating for vaccine mandates while simultaneously spewing nonsense like that?
To put it another way, they want people to participate based on "good faith." But can anyone tell me what they've done to earn the trust of people for the people to have faith in them?
If anything, their actions have not only been antithetical to science -- which is founding on being able to ask any questions you want and to have healthy debates about critical issues -- but they've also been taking a very authoritarian approach to all of this since day one, while completely ignoring any science that came before, and anything they don't want to believe now.
To further illustrate my point, in my first post, I elucidated that there have been 1,517,211 maimed/injured and 9,027 deaths following the vaccines recorded in the U.S. Government’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), right?
To any sane person, that should be a huge red flag. Period.
But, it's actually not the worst of it, because that same VAERS report is also being wildly under-reported.
According to a study done back in 2010, before Covid, by Harvard (commissioned by our own government), less than 1% of all adverse reactions to vaccines are actually submitted to VAERS.
To date, the issues with the VAERS report still have not been fixed either.
Let that sink in. So if those numbers above are only representative of <1%, what the hell would the actual statistics look like?
As a fun side-note, the VAERS report also doesn't include the thousands of people being effected by Bell's Palsy. But you don't hear about any of this on the news either, huh? Social media and big tech almost damn sure that anyone bringing such questions up immediately gets silenced and then the boot as well.
Here's some further reading on the VAERS system, if you're interested:
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/vaccine-injury-reporting-systems-utterly-inadequate/
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/covid-vaccine-injuries-vaers-cdc/?utm_source=salsa&eType=EmailBlastContent&eId=9af36675-e8d3-4040-a6be-abcb46990996
Anyway, I have zero problem if you or anyone else want to take the vaccine. Be my guest. I'm not trying to force you into not getting it or taking my position. The only purpose of my posts is to show why people are hesitant, myself included, and why I have no plan on taking the jab at all. There may very well be things that I end up being wrong about -- and I'm perfectly ok with that. Because it's still important that those things are answered or investigated.
As I said in my first post, it's completely up to you to keep yourself informed and to form your own views on it.
My biggest problem is the people who are getting vaccinated trying to force those who are not, while simultaneously being completely ignorant and simply parroting whatever TV, social media, or celebrities, tell them.
Best of luck to you, man.
Marek's.
Marek is a common Polish name (usually first name) and I think Czech/Slovak too.