It’s a prime example of how media matters. Media outlets don’t just shape the way that people think; they also alter their behavior in hugely meaningful ways.
Next do also study how many ccn viewers hated Trump and are still blaming Trump for everything, and how many cnn viewers swear by vaccines; all media do brainwashing to audience that does not research stuff outside of media claims
Should be "Connecting the dots between Covid vaccine hesitancy and the general low quality of the vaccines". I took the vaccine months ago but at this point I don't think I could make the case that anyone who hasn't should, unless they are old in which case it's probably still a good idea.
unless they are old in which case it's probably still a good idea.
Even then it's not, as it's prone to cause pulmonary embolism, clotting, and fibromyalgia to name to a few. The biggest issue and reason you aren't seeing death tolls widely broadcast for old people is because they oftentimes have another co-morbidity (or several) that mask the problems endemic to the messengers getting into the bloodstream. So if you're old, people just chalk it up that your heart failure was due to being old, that the brain inflammation was due to some other medication, that the central nervous system degradation is due to being unhealthy, and that the thrombosis was probably some other medical complication.
Dr. Malone called this kind of phenomena "masking", because unfortunately old people who lived unhealthy lives typically have a lot of health issues, and so the complications caused by the vaccines are masked under those other complications.
Unfortunately, there is zero data available regarding efficacy in old people, since there have been no longitudinal studies done before these vaccines were made public.
We won't know what the Phase III clinical trial results will be like until 2023.
Maybe so, but it still will reduce the symptoms for old folks, which is about the only part of this SHILL vaccine that happens to work.
We do still have efficacy data, the drug companies had old people in their studies. it sounds like they are trying to rush the 'fda approval', but i dont think the fags can hack it.
Maybe so, but it still will reduce the symptoms for old folks, which is about the only part of this SHILL vaccine that happens to work.
Based on what? Where's your longitudinal, peer-reviewed control data?
Link me the study.
We do still have efficacy data, the drug companies had old people in their studies. it sounds like they are trying to rush the 'fda approval', but i dont think the fags can hack it.
So where's the literature so I can read what the efficacy data is for old people myself?
Well, when you legally admit you are not a journalist (Hello, Richard Maddow) and all you do is put out provable propaganda (CNN and MSNBC), you should automatically lose protections.
lol they changed the title, it was originally-
That title can still be found on an archive of their homepage: https://archive.is/0D1kN#selection-3394.0-3394.1
Thanks for the archive bro, thats the title I saw/
Next do also study how many ccn viewers hated Trump and are still blaming Trump for everything, and how many cnn viewers swear by vaccines; all media do brainwashing to audience that does not research stuff outside of media claims
Should be "Connecting the dots between Covid vaccine hesitancy and the general low quality of the vaccines". I took the vaccine months ago but at this point I don't think I could make the case that anyone who hasn't should, unless they are old in which case it's probably still a good idea.
Even then it's not, as it's prone to cause pulmonary embolism, clotting, and fibromyalgia to name to a few. The biggest issue and reason you aren't seeing death tolls widely broadcast for old people is because they oftentimes have another co-morbidity (or several) that mask the problems endemic to the messengers getting into the bloodstream. So if you're old, people just chalk it up that your heart failure was due to being old, that the brain inflammation was due to some other medication, that the central nervous system degradation is due to being unhealthy, and that the thrombosis was probably some other medical complication.
Dr. Malone called this kind of phenomena "masking", because unfortunately old people who lived unhealthy lives typically have a lot of health issues, and so the complications caused by the vaccines are masked under those other complications.
Unfortunately, there is zero data available regarding efficacy in old people, since there have been no longitudinal studies done before these vaccines were made public.
We won't know what the Phase III clinical trial results will be like until 2023.
Maybe so, but it still will reduce the symptoms for old folks, which is about the only part of this SHILL vaccine that happens to work.
We do still have efficacy data, the drug companies had old people in their studies. it sounds like they are trying to rush the 'fda approval', but i dont think the fags can hack it.
Based on what? Where's your longitudinal, peer-reviewed control data?
Link me the study.
So where's the literature so I can read what the efficacy data is for old people myself?
I agree. The propo is just too much, though. its sad how easily retards turn into Nazis
Can we just remove protections for mainstream organizations? To be a journalist, you can't be sponsored by a corporation.
I dont know how we could do it without harming the 1st, but its worth exploring if that was possible.
Well, when you legally admit you are not a journalist (Hello, Richard Maddow) and all you do is put out provable propaganda (CNN and MSNBC), you should automatically lose protections.
I thought it was BET, since black people as a demographic are disproportionately resistant to taking the vaccine.