Probably some combination of glowies, and people just getting more blackpilled in response to recent happenings. I know I've been feeling/sounding more "extreme," if you want to call it that. And, no, for the record, I'm not planning any violence, and I don't have information that will lead to the arrest of Hillary Clinton.
But, yeah, we're teetering on the brink of absolute despotism, and the people who are realizing that will sound more and more extreme. Shit is headed in monumentally, historically bad directions. That will lead to - justifiably - more "extreme" opinions. I'd actually argue that the crazier things get, the less extreme so called extremist ideas actually are. As the governments turn increasingly against their own citizens, being against them and the newly emerging status quo isn't extreme, it's common sense. And that's not just my opinion, that's in America's own founding documents.
So I think much of the increase in edgy content recently from people is actually organic, although I'd be shocked if there weren't also feds participating...there's essentially zero percent chance there aren't fedbois fedposting, in fact. I'm also not discounting an upcoming false flag. Historically speaking, it's all but guaranteed, unfortunately. They've consolidated a lot of power, but they need some big event to push the last bit in. Something is almost certainly coming down the pipes.
Some losers have even responded. Wish I had Twitter so I could ask them their BMI, blood pressure, cholesterol, sperm count/egg fertility, testosterone/estrogen levels, abortion/STD history, etc and see if they answered.
Double vaxxed as soon as I could. Doing my part for our communities in Essex. AZ + Moderna #VaccinesWork #vaccinated
I'd like to ask her if the vaccines killing people meant they're working. Also who told her to mix & match? It wasn't the WHO, CDC or any other infallible expertz...nor the drug makers themselves! They're not even the same technology...AZ is a viral vector vaccines while Moderna is mRNA.
You can tell just how deadly-and-totally-not-political this pandemic is given the fact that vaccine clinics have set official "Selfie Stations" on site.
Oof, they're double dead. Potentially, of course. Seriously, though...oof.
Also who told her to mix & match? It wasn't the WHO, CDC or any other infallible expertz...
Actually, CDC has recommended that, as well as vaccinations for pregnant women. Not sure what the WHO has said on the issue, but I wouldn't be surprised to see a flip there at some point too, if it hasn't happened already.
But, yes, the CDC has recommended mixing vaccines, because we're in the really crazy timeline.
Many (tho not all) conservatives I’ve run into over the years are pro-life. And yet, many conservatives are anti-lockdown. Well, I don’t understand how you can be pro-life and anti-lockdown. Cuz #COVID-19 lockdowns are 100% about pro-life. Aren’t they? source
If you oppose (what you view as) murder, then you have to support LOCKDOWNS. Not very bright, this fellow.
I'm convinced some of these fucks don't even have a moral compass. They certainly don't exercise it, or critical thinking either.
Principles matter. So, if your principle is freedom, for example, you'd oppose abortion if you see it as murder, since murder is sort of a big infringement on freedom. You'd also be against lockdowns as they're anti-freedom.
Likewise, if you don't view abortion as murder, but value freedom, you might be pro-abortion, for the freedom of the pregnant woman. I'd say being pro-choice and pro-lockdown is more nonsensical than their example. But it just goes to show they don't value freedom. They believe in lockdowns because they think it's up to a central authority to force "safety" on people.
Well, their principle is power. "One does not establish the dictatorship to safeguard the revolution, one makes the revolution in order to safeguard the dictatorship."
So, if your principle is freedom, for example, you'd oppose abortion if you see it as murder, since murder is sort of a big infringement on freedom. You'd also be against lockdowns as they're anti-freedom.
I do have to disagree with you here somewhat though. If your principle is freedom, you do not automatically have to oppose lockdowns. With any issue of complexity, multiple principles will be at stake, and it depends on how you balance them.
But it just goes to show they don't value freedom. They believe in lockdowns because they think it's up to a central authority to force "safety" on people.
I would argue that it is not about safety or even "safety". I lost that illusion, despite initially supporting lockdowns, when they told everyone to go out and protest for violent thugs who got themselves killed.
Probably some combination of glowies, and people just getting more blackpilled in response to recent happenings. I know I've been feeling/sounding more "extreme," if you want to call it that. And, no, for the record, I'm not planning any violence, and I don't have information that will lead to the arrest of Hillary Clinton.
But, yeah, we're teetering on the brink of absolute despotism, and the people who are realizing that will sound more and more extreme. Shit is headed in monumentally, historically bad directions. That will lead to - justifiably - more "extreme" opinions. I'd actually argue that the crazier things get, the less extreme so called extremist ideas actually are. As the governments turn increasingly against their own citizens, being against them and the newly emerging status quo isn't extreme, it's common sense. And that's not just my opinion, that's in America's own founding documents.
So I think much of the increase in edgy content recently from people is actually organic, although I'd be shocked if there weren't also feds participating...there's essentially zero percent chance there aren't fedbois fedposting, in fact. I'm also not discounting an upcoming false flag. Historically speaking, it's all but guaranteed, unfortunately. They've consolidated a lot of power, but they need some big event to push the last bit in. Something is almost certainly coming down the pipes.
Some losers have even responded. Wish I had Twitter so I could ask them their BMI, blood pressure, cholesterol, sperm count/egg fertility, testosterone/estrogen levels, abortion/STD history, etc and see if they answered.
https://archive.ph/Qp5BH
I'd like to ask her if the vaccines killing people meant they're working. Also who told her to mix & match? It wasn't the WHO, CDC or any other infallible expertz...nor the drug makers themselves! They're not even the same technology...AZ is a viral vector vaccines while Moderna is mRNA.
You can tell just how deadly-and-totally-not-political this pandemic is given the fact that vaccine clinics have set official "Selfie Stations" on site.
https://twitter.com/TheRealKeean/status/1426642152314966020
Oof, they're double dead. Potentially, of course. Seriously, though...oof.
Actually, CDC has recommended that, as well as vaccinations for pregnant women. Not sure what the WHO has said on the issue, but I wouldn't be surprised to see a flip there at some point too, if it hasn't happened already.
But, yes, the CDC has recommended mixing vaccines, because we're in the really crazy timeline.
Here is an earlier tweet by this one:
If you oppose (what you view as) murder, then you have to support LOCKDOWNS. Not very bright, this fellow.
I'm convinced some of these fucks don't even have a moral compass. They certainly don't exercise it, or critical thinking either.
Principles matter. So, if your principle is freedom, for example, you'd oppose abortion if you see it as murder, since murder is sort of a big infringement on freedom. You'd also be against lockdowns as they're anti-freedom.
Likewise, if you don't view abortion as murder, but value freedom, you might be pro-abortion, for the freedom of the pregnant woman. I'd say being pro-choice and pro-lockdown is more nonsensical than their example. But it just goes to show they don't value freedom. They believe in lockdowns because they think it's up to a central authority to force "safety" on people.
Well, their principle is power. "One does not establish the dictatorship to safeguard the revolution, one makes the revolution in order to safeguard the dictatorship."
I do have to disagree with you here somewhat though. If your principle is freedom, you do not automatically have to oppose lockdowns. With any issue of complexity, multiple principles will be at stake, and it depends on how you balance them.
I would argue that it is not about safety or even "safety". I lost that illusion, despite initially supporting lockdowns, when they told everyone to go out and protest for violent thugs who got themselves killed.
They don't consider it murder because they're mentally deficient. This line of reasoning doesn't work because they simply cannot see reason.