This 7 min clip summarizes the toxicity of the vaccine spike protein
(www.bitchute.com)
Comments (14)
sorted by:
I just had a long vaccine discussion with someone yesterday who is all for them and borderline on requiring them. My main point was based on things like this. The point being, why am I only supposed to listen to vaccine supporting opinions? There are qualified doctors on both sides of the argument. I think the vaccine should be made available by choice to any adults who want it. If you want it, get it, if you don't then don't.
I'm not even close to conspiratorial enough to think it's designed with malicious intent, just rushed and reckless. It would be great if mRNA tech turned out to be a good useful method for dealing with disease. Maybe we could figure out actual shitty viruses like Ebola with it.
When you've got so many people I don't trust working so diligently to silence half the argument, that's a huge red flag. I brought that up, and the discussion kinda died. This person isn't a raging leftist but I do know they are absolutely terrified of Covid. So that fear throws rational thought out the window to be replaced with CNN speak about how no one wears masks and they all haven't gotten the vaccine and it's all their fault. It's almost like a video game, until I can cleanse out the fear, there's no room for anything else.
You're conversing with an animal, not a person.
Since I'm talking immediate family I'm kinda stuck with situations as they are and it's not feasible to really just cut off entirely. It's severe mental illness. They'd never admit to that, but to as an observer it's very easy to see.
Normies will be shocked when they hear about this in a year.
Wow, that's filled with a lot of misinformation and anti-science conclusions.
He states that because in some lab rats they didn't find spike proteins in the bloodstream within 48-hours that it's not a big a deal? Based on one study? Even while real-life deaths are proving otherwise? Where are the large-scale sample tests? Where are the detailed breakdowns for the methodologies? Where are the peer reviewed studies with cross-study examinations for the pre-trial screenings? Where is ALL of the data regarding risks and effects for the public to peruse?
He goes on to regurgitate talking points by Pfizer and Moderna without addressing any of the actual concerns associated with the mRNA vaccines, such as Pfizer's own pre-clinial trial screening that observed spontaneous abortions, which literally happened once women who were pregnant took the vaccine. The CDC, Pfizer, and the FDA still all encouraged pregnant women to take the vaccine... what kind of insanity is that?
He also states...
This is his interpretation based on a quote from a limited data point found in study ciab465. It's not a longitudinal study, nor does it breakdown the methodology of efficacy.
In fact, the whole piece he quotes from is vaccine propaganda, which clearly states....
So they literally admit they don't have enough data to determine how widespread the spike protein is in bloodstream, or travel rates, but clearly... it's safe?!?!
They later go on to say...
So dozens of pregnant women instantly sport spontaneous abortions shortly after taking the vaccine and that's reassuring? COVID has not caused any reported spontaneous abortions. So the vaccine is doing something COVID did not do.
Those are just my basic misgivings about the way the Medium piece mishandles and misconstrues data without offering opposing data.
For instance, the viral immunologists from Guelph, Ontario noted that the messengers do travel, and they outline exactly WHY there's such a stark rise in myocarditis in young people, as well as permanent organ failure for people who have taken the mRNA vaccines: https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/covid-vaccine-spike-protein-travels-from-injection-site-organ-damage/
According to Bridle...
So that's literally in stark contrast to the Medium post, Pfizer's claims, Moderna's claims, and all the other health officials who claimed the protein was not a toxin.
And before you dismiss the data out of hand, this is based on multiple studies involving people who have actually been vaccinated. As pointed out in the piece...
This is literally identical to what Dr. Hoffe observed in his patients, for whom he stated 62% of the ones who were vaccinated showed signs of clotting: https://www.bitchute.com/video/ChQwQBggc8TL/
So now, who do we believe? Research done on those who have actually been vaccinated, or Big Pharma, Big Tech, CDC, and FDA who have gone out of their way to censor all of the reports about adverse side-effects, refuse to track death-rates of the vaccine, and have censored or banned any health official who openly talks about patients who have had fatal or near-fatal experiences with the vaccine?
A lawsuit is pending right now by America's Frontline Doctors who noted that tens of thousands of people have died from the vaccine. And in separate studies, found more cases of spontaneous abortions in pregnant women who have taken the vaccine, among many other severe and permanent health issues: https://img1.wsimg.com/blobby/go/3c6a0774-cfad-46fa-aa97-af5aa5e74f00/M%20for%20PI%20file%20stamped.pdf
That's not to mention that the one study showing that the death-rates for the vaccines out-weighed the recovery rates was pulled after Leftists found out about it: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-393X/9/7/693/htm
In a sane world that data would be discussed ad nauseam before even thinking about authorizing or recommending the use of such drugs to anyone.
Thanks for taking the time to write all that!
I hope u/NihilistCaregiver responds.
It's not your fault.
I don't mean to be harsh, but a lot of the "mainstream" or publicly accessible data that can be easily found on places like Google are designed to mislead.
Just like how they say that the protein won't bind to the ACE2 receptor, even though in the actual research studying those who have taken the vaccine, they literally found that brain inflammation and other neurological breakdowns were caused by the spike protein binding to the ACE2 receptors.
In the research they state...
In short, we have to be careful about information regarding the vaccines and whether or not they're hitting talking points or addressing issues based on longitudinal research and actual empirical data.
A good way to find out whether someone is spreading bunk about the vaccine is if they ignore contrasting studies/research and stick to the talking points outlined in the official propaganda pamphlet that the FDA, CDC and WHO have medical professionals recite to patients. You can view one of the propaganda pamphlets here: https://i.imgur.com/2Xelniv.jpg
I only think there’s no reason for healthy people to take experimental medical treatments that aren’t FDA approved, and that they SHOULD NOT be forced to by employers or governments. Do you agree with that?
I believe an old tech vaccine exists in other countries like Mexico; people have said that but I haven’t researched it.
Yes, even with that I'm going to wait a while and let others be guinea pigs before getting injected.