This negates the possible strategy of starting a war to get rid of a large amount of men
That's not a strategy, just your usual insane and paranoid fantasies.
they'd have to send their own as well.
The cutest thing about you is that you think the ruling class cares about anyone.
have you seen their infanticide record?!
Well, you clearly haven't, because any time I've asked questions about it you were completely quiet. How many kids are killed by wahmen per 100,000 inhabitants?
It's just a coincidence that women are always on the side agitating for more war. Remember when all the warmongering neocons decided to join up with feminism to stop Trump?.
Pretty sure they care about themselves.
I've posted the data before. Female majority and the majority of the victims are male.
It's just a coincidence that women are always on the side agitating for more war.
Can you show me that women, on average, are more likely the support a given war, than men are? And if so, can you provide any reason for your claim that it's definitely a conspiracy to get you killed?
Pretty sure they care about themselves.
Certainly not about the men - or women - they'll send to their deaths.
I've posted the data before. Female majority and the majority of the victims are male.
Post numbers. Majority means a percentage. Your previous raving I had already seen. I asked you to post the actual numbers, preferably per 100,000 of the population, which you ignored there as here.
I don't see your evidence that women, on average, are more likely to support war than men. Nor your evidence for your claim about motivation. Nor did I see your proof for theiiir 'infanticide record' after thrice asking.
Instead, I got a question about 'Russian hacking'.
Just admit that you're making stuff up again, just like you were absolutely sure that the MN cop would never be indicted, and that her name would not be revealed.
That's not a strategy, just your usual insane and paranoid fantasies.
The cutest thing about you is that you think the ruling class cares about anyone.
Well, you clearly haven't, because any time I've asked questions about it you were completely quiet. How many kids are killed by wahmen per 100,000 inhabitants?
It's just a coincidence that women are always on the side agitating for more war. Remember when all the warmongering neocons decided to join up with feminism to stop Trump?.
Pretty sure they care about themselves.
I've posted the data before. Female majority and the majority of the victims are male.
Can you show me that women, on average, are more likely the support a given war, than men are? And if so, can you provide any reason for your claim that it's definitely a conspiracy to get you killed?
Certainly not about the men - or women - they'll send to their deaths.
Post numbers. Majority means a percentage. Your previous raving I had already seen. I asked you to post the actual numbers, preferably per 100,000 of the population, which you ignored there as here.
Who pushed Russian hacking again?
I don't see your evidence that women, on average, are more likely to support war than men. Nor your evidence for your claim about motivation. Nor did I see your proof for theiiir 'infanticide record' after thrice asking.
Instead, I got a question about 'Russian hacking'.
Just admit that you're making stuff up again, just like you were absolutely sure that the MN cop would never be indicted, and that her name would not be revealed.