I don't see your evidence that women, on average, are more likely to support war than men. Nor your evidence for your claim about motivation. Nor did I see your proof for theiiir 'infanticide record' after thrice asking.
Instead, I got a question about 'Russian hacking'.
Just admit that you're making stuff up again, just like you were absolutely sure that the MN cop would never be indicted, and that her name would not be revealed.
Why are diverting and not simply presenting your no doubt copious evidence that women, on average, are more likely to favor war, and for the reason that they want you dead.
Who pushed Russian hacking again?
I don't see your evidence that women, on average, are more likely to support war than men. Nor your evidence for your claim about motivation. Nor did I see your proof for theiiir 'infanticide record' after thrice asking.
Instead, I got a question about 'Russian hacking'.
Just admit that you're making stuff up again, just like you were absolutely sure that the MN cop would never be indicted, and that her name would not be revealed.
I'm not sure if you were aware but women were the people agitating that Russia "stole democracy" with all the acts of war that entails.
That was the whole topic of the Women's March, between the murderers speaking, of course.
Why are diverting and not simply presenting your no doubt copious evidence that women, on average, are more likely to favor war, and for the reason that they want you dead.
And same for your infanticide. Thank you.