The issue is there doesn't really seem to be a place for people who value "traditional moral values, humility, and family".
Say that convention existed and did in fact ban her: she still would be complaining (and probably say something like "gee I wonder how they recognized me" in the process) , and people would be bringing up Mary Magdalene and declaring it "hateful" and all the same shit they're doing now.
I suppose that depends on whether or not TPUSA is trying to brand itself as "conservative" or "libertarian". I have always heard them described as "conservative", but that mission statement sounds more "libertarian" in nature since it seems focused exclusively on economic policies.
If they try to say they are "conservative" but also have that as their mission statement than somewhere along the way either someone is confused or they are engaging in deception. Because like it or not in American politics there has always been some element of traditionalist Christian morality attached to the movement.
I'm of course ignoring the fact that they discriminate on the basis of what "freedoms" people are concerned with. They aren't huge fans of freedom of association for example, as they generally don't let people in who take issue with the Civil Right Act and its rather broad application even to intra-state commerce.
There's nothing "false dichotomy" about a two party system. Third parties stand for principles and they don't get elected. The closer they are to the cause you like, the more likely the enemy of your cause gets elected as a result. Not a bug, but a feature designed by TPTB.
The issue is there doesn't really seem to be a place for people who value "traditional moral values, humility, and family".
Say that convention existed and did in fact ban her: she still would be complaining (and probably say something like "gee I wonder how they recognized me" in the process) , and people would be bringing up Mary Magdalene and declaring it "hateful" and all the same shit they're doing now.
I suppose that depends on whether or not TPUSA is trying to brand itself as "conservative" or "libertarian". I have always heard them described as "conservative", but that mission statement sounds more "libertarian" in nature since it seems focused exclusively on economic policies.
If they try to say they are "conservative" but also have that as their mission statement than somewhere along the way either someone is confused or they are engaging in deception. Because like it or not in American politics there has always been some element of traditionalist Christian morality attached to the movement.
I'm of course ignoring the fact that they discriminate on the basis of what "freedoms" people are concerned with. They aren't huge fans of freedom of association for example, as they generally don't let people in who take issue with the Civil Right Act and its rather broad application even to intra-state commerce.
How do you propose to deal with the reality that people still hold them and may be unwilling to stop holding them?
There's nothing "false dichotomy" about a two party system. Third parties stand for principles and they don't get elected. The closer they are to the cause you like, the more likely the enemy of your cause gets elected as a result. Not a bug, but a feature designed by TPTB.