I'm in two minds over this. Is it more "Male Feminist is exposed as a depraved creep, more at 11" or is this "A Lesson that Leftist Business "Ethics" is a losing game".
The report pointed directly to the company's battle.net online service team, where "women who were not 'huge gamers' or 'core gamers' and not into the party scene were excluded and treated like outsiders."
I would guess both, leaning toward the latter. If the heads of your team wanted you gone, an accusation of sexual harassment was the most efficient way to do it. However, if you were a friend of the people running things, you could get away with basically anything shy of a criminal conviction.
I'm in two minds over this. Is it more "Male Feminist is exposed as a depraved creep, more at 11" or is this "A Lesson that Leftist Business "Ethics" is a losing game".
The latter. From Ars Technica:
hahahaha, ofc they are excluded, if you work for a gaming company but have no interest in gaming.
They just want unfettered access to the orbiters.
because they are. objectively.
I would guess both, leaning toward the latter. If the heads of your team wanted you gone, an accusation of sexual harassment was the most efficient way to do it. However, if you were a friend of the people running things, you could get away with basically anything shy of a criminal conviction.
Seems like a win win