Here, I largely refer to the tranny situation, and the LBTQ++++---- movement more broadly, but it applies to other things as well, as I will go into.
Look, trannies exist. Gender dysphoria is a real thing, even if I... Think that reclassifying it as "not a mental illness" was a definite mistake. Anyway, that's all fine, though I do find the explosion of... "Trans teens", particularly of the FTM variety, particularly in the last... 5 years or so, to be rather disturbing.
What I really despise, though, is how the media focuses on the inner lives, and niche opinions, of a tiny, tiny subset of the population. Trannies make up a tiny portion of the Alphabet Soup, nonbinary even less. And the alphabet soup itself has been chronically overestimated as a proportion of the population, due almost entirely to media saturation...
Most people are straight. The VAST majority of those who are not, are a) under 30, and b) bi. And again, a very significant proportion of that is, in no small part, due to social contagion, "experimentation", and, once again, media saturation. Hell, even most "famous people"/celebs are also straight, but looking at the fucking media, you would never guess, because, hmm, who gets the most attention again?
This is what frustrates me, then. These people are the loudest. They scream, and yell, and whine for attention, offline, but mostly online, and the fucking media gives it to them in spades. Looking at the TV now, even looking at ADS, even in fucking Australia of all places, you would think that some 20% of the population, at least, were some form of queer, and an even larger proportion were in some sort of "mixed race" relationship, because that is a large part, now, of what we see spat back at us.
This isn't representative. At all. Hell, the proportions I discussed above MIGHT apply in, say, the Anglosphere (US, mostly), and other bits of Western Europe, but in a larger part of the world, they're probably barely a fifth of that, even including those in the closet...
This is just so... Tiresome. I'm tired of hearing about the need for further "gay rights" in the West. I'm tired of the need for "all gender bathrooms" and "decolonising queer vaginas". I'm so fucking over it. But that is so much of what the media, even the supposed "news" media/serious journalism, down here, talks about, that it is just... Very hard to get away from, at this point. And then, of course, you have fucking Reddit, and Fuckbook, and worst of all Twitter shivers ...
Anyway, those are just my thoughts. A lot of you seemed to appreciate my previous writings, so, as demoralised as I am by it all, I thought I might write this out, somewhere where, unlike Reddit, I wouldn't immediately get banned for doing so. Would honestly appreciate your thoughts on the sitch. Cheers.
There is no argument against trannies that doesnt also apply to homos.
They all need to be shoved back into the closet. Society doesnt work unless there is a separation of the public and private spheres of behavior, and sanctions for airing private issues in public.
I kind of disagree with you. Trans are a lot more damaging to themselves and society then gays. Sure gays have their problems and all but the normalization of trans is directly hurting people. A "bisexual" girl will have no consequence from it when she gets married and has kids but gender theory is creating trans and the damage is not as easily reversible and sometimes the damage is permanent.
The damage gays have done has been more subtle but they are all degenerates. The rate of pedophilia among gays is astronomically higher than the general population. But "normalization" means we can't deny gays access to positions where they have power over children.
Also imagine the massive amount of resources that are spent keeping degenerates who give themselves AIDS alive when they should have just been quarantined.
Yeah, I agree with this. This would have to be my perspective on it, too..
Like Elleniot Page. Came out as les. No real consequences apart from maybe some trolling.
Came out as enbee + trans (lololol) - got divorced and has now chopped her effing tits off (seriously, eyebleach...), so if and when she/it inevitably does "detransition", because that becomes trendy/her narcissism demands it, uhh... That is gonna come back to bite them (? or is it... Xe? Or it? No word of a lie, I can't keep up anymore!)
Ok... Sure, but where do you draw the line, then. Like, I'm not gay. Gay PDA makes me more uncomfortable than straight, because, no shit, of course it does. But what about straight, "cis" PDA..?
Like if I, hypothetically, wanted to uhh, go necking with my GF in public, would you want that shoved away/banned, too? Or do we consider that acceptable, as it has been for much longer than homo/queer/whatever shit has been..?
Because society without straight PDA, at least in terms of pop culture, would be really fucking dull, and rather sad, ngl...
First you have to agree that a line has to be drawn somewhere. After that we can argue about the specifics.
And need to acknowledge that no matter where the line is drawn there will be edge cases but that doesn't disprove the need for rules, only means the rules need to be adjusted if it can be proven this specific calibration isn't optimal.
Affection doesn't equal bring a pervert. If you're slopping down your girl in public, yes, stop