Something that’s has irked me for some time now is how many people latched onto the Atheist movement as an edgy teen but now look back on it in reverence and not shame. This seems to be a common theme in academia and is prevalent even in communities like this one. The lamentation of the “golden-age” of atheism is peak hubris. Dawkins, Hitchens, and crew were deconstructionists of the critical theory variety. Their lives were consumed by the need to disprove God and religion. However these were the shortsighted desires of pseudo-intellectuals, they accomplished nothing productive, and if anything, opened the door for the screaming children that replaced them. I don’t think Dawkins, in his wildest dreams, ever saw his fall come from his own hubris. The intellectual argument over dismantling religion somehow disproving the existence of a god is what fueled the SJWS and their own brand of hubris in the early 2000’s. BTW Dawkins, this is what happens when you remove the “tumor” of religion, you hack. As you see today, Dawkins was swallowed by the stupidity he helped bring about, the Maximilien Robespierre of the modern era, begging for trannies to not cut off his head.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (111)
sorted by:
Atheism has always been cringe. Along with gay rights it’s always just been another weapon for globohomo to batter our doors down. What good did any of those faggots do us in the end? They got the Ten Commandments taken off a few government buildings, they got a few nativity scenes taken down from public property. Great, that was really worth all of the fucking rape-gangs and child drag queens.
In the end Aethism was only allowed to gun any support in the public conscious because it aligned with the faggy one-people-one-race bullshit of the left. Once the ugly dune-coon related questions started popping up they dropped it like a burning potato.
Oh yeah, Christopher Hitches was well known for his sterling defense of Islam, which promotes those rape gangs. Good point. I hadn't thought about it because that's wrong.
I love how you're arguing that Atheism did nothing, but also is solely responsible for the rise of Leftism. It's one or the other. Either Atheism did relatively little to the institutions of power, and thus can't have been the explanation for the rise of Leftism into those institutions (this is true); or Atheism had a huge impact on the institutions of power and their seizure by Leftism caused the institutions to be seized by Leftism (utter fiction). It can not be that Atheism had almost no impact on the institutions of power, which allowed Leftism to seize the institutions of power.
Hey Giz,
I think Suffer is falling for one of the Left's favourite tricks - appropriating an entire section of society to themselves, so that they and they alone can represent them and further their emancipation - which strangely always involves the 500th attempt to build a communist utopia from the corpses of everybody.
That's because it's typical collectivist strategy to do that.