Because most people know what women's studies professors say is not representative of anything but the views of the radical feminists that created the field.
The quote I reel off so often about male genocide is from the literal founder of women's studies.
Y'know, you could make your claims a lot more powerful if you stopped claiming more than you can prove.
What is actually true is bad enough. There's not even a need to exaggerate and claim that 'all women believe this' or even 'all feminists believe this'. If I were you, I'd just point out that they support someone who says such a thing, without making any claim that they can disprove by just saying: "well, I don't believe that".
Probably true. But I think I just like to go a little bit further, to infer that greater plan behind it all.
I didn't ever say all women believed it, I said any woman could and I wouldn't trust any of them, because one of the core tenets of radical feminism, as stated by Solanas and others, is to hide what you are until you have a position where you can help the cause.
As such, simple claims that "I don't believe that" mean absolutely zero to me.
I do believe all feminists believe it though, and I won't retract that claim.
Probably true. But I think I just like to go a little bit further, to infer that greater plan behind it all.
That's fine and all, but say that to the average person and he will think that you are the crazy one.
I said any woman could and I wouldn't trust any of them
But any man could as well, right? You say that it's not in the "interests" of men to believe it. But of course, it's not in the interests of the average woman to have her father, sons and brothers killed for no reason at all either.
is to hide what you are until you have a position where you can help the cause.
Just assuming for a moment that you are correct. If they are hiding it, then by definition they don't leave evidence for it. But that means that you are trying to prove something in the absence of evidence. And you can prove anything without evidence if your axiom is that "it's true because they're trying to hide it". So this will not be persuasive to the average person, as it is not to me (stupidity is a far better explanation than some grand plan).
I do believe all feminists believe it though, and I won't retract that claim.
It doesn't matter if you do. Do note that I was a feminist 7 years ago, without believing any such thing. But if you're trying to persuade people that feminists are bad, then even if you were absolutely sure of this but could not prove it, you'd be better off not claiming it.
Because most people know what women's studies professors say is not representative of anything but the views of the radical feminists that created the field.
The quote I reel off so often about male genocide is from the literal founder of women's studies.
Y'know, you could make your claims a lot more powerful if you stopped claiming more than you can prove.
What is actually true is bad enough. There's not even a need to exaggerate and claim that 'all women believe this' or even 'all feminists believe this'. If I were you, I'd just point out that they support someone who says such a thing, without making any claim that they can disprove by just saying: "well, I don't believe that".
Sometimes, less is more.
Probably true. But I think I just like to go a little bit further, to infer that greater plan behind it all.
I didn't ever say all women believed it, I said any woman could and I wouldn't trust any of them, because one of the core tenets of radical feminism, as stated by Solanas and others, is to hide what you are until you have a position where you can help the cause.
As such, simple claims that "I don't believe that" mean absolutely zero to me.
I do believe all feminists believe it though, and I won't retract that claim.
That's fine and all, but say that to the average person and he will think that you are the crazy one.
But any man could as well, right? You say that it's not in the "interests" of men to believe it. But of course, it's not in the interests of the average woman to have her father, sons and brothers killed for no reason at all either.
Just assuming for a moment that you are correct. If they are hiding it, then by definition they don't leave evidence for it. But that means that you are trying to prove something in the absence of evidence. And you can prove anything without evidence if your axiom is that "it's true because they're trying to hide it". So this will not be persuasive to the average person, as it is not to me (stupidity is a far better explanation than some grand plan).
It doesn't matter if you do. Do note that I was a feminist 7 years ago, without believing any such thing. But if you're trying to persuade people that feminists are bad, then even if you were absolutely sure of this but could not prove it, you'd be better off not claiming it.
At first they think I'm crazy, but after recent events, I've never looked more likely to be correct than I do at this moment.
Every vaccine has been revealed to have horrendous side effects, only in men.
The G7 openly stated they will "rebuild in a more feminine way".
The UN has taken in 40bn in donations towards their goal of 50%+ government ministers being female by 2030.
Melinda Gates and Mckenzie Bezos have both cut their partners out of their organizations and now are openly advocating for the supremacy of women.