Similar tactics seem like they’d work in reverse. Find a gay person, forcibly isolate them from the gay community both online and in real life, provide them friendship and make them feel good and welcomed, only let them be around straight people, force them to disassociate with their gay friends, and gradually expose them to the sexual content about the opposite sex and make sure they are aroused when watching it.
That is... not what I thought conversion therapy would be. It also raises a whole ton of ethical questions about training/detraining people's sexuality like lab rats...
It also raises a whole ton of ethical questions about training/detraining people's sexuality like lab rats...
They're already doing it to today's youth generation by bombarding them with overt homosexuality across every media sphere and institution. They're already doing it to heterosexuals, but I haven't seen one Liberal, Democrat, or Progressive rebuff their conversion therapy via inculcation as "unethical".
The difference between the two is that heterosexuality is normal, homosexuality is aberrant. Converting people from the aberrant back into normalcy is fine; doing the reverse only leads to what we're seeing unfold right now with society collapsing in on itself.
That is... not what I thought conversion therapy would be. It also raises a whole ton of ethical questions about training/detraining people's sexuality like lab rats...
They're already doing it to today's youth generation by bombarding them with overt homosexuality across every media sphere and institution. They're already doing it to heterosexuals, but I haven't seen one Liberal, Democrat, or Progressive rebuff their conversion therapy via inculcation as "unethical".
The difference between the two is that heterosexuality is normal, homosexuality is aberrant. Converting people from the aberrant back into normalcy is fine; doing the reverse only leads to what we're seeing unfold right now with society collapsing in on itself.