Their population was such an issue that the Communists forced them to have less kids, saying everyone would starve to death.
Imagine that in Europe, the screeching about men "controlling" women would be absolutely deafening and we'd all end up actually starving to death because of their unwillingness to do anything for society.
Everyone was going to starve to death because the communist party screwed up and killed anyone good at farming causing food shortages. The issues wasn’t over population but central planning caused food shortages.
Nothing is better for a society than the productive, desirable groups forgoing population maintenance to compensate for the undesirable groups outbreeding them at an alarming rate.
Tell me you're a white nationalist without saying you're a white nationalist.
If wanting European ethnic groups and culture to remain dominant in Europe makes me a white nationalist, then sure.
It's not a race thing.
Entirely ignoring race, mass importing members of societies with fundamentally different cultures, religions, values and norms who fail to meet the criteria for legal immigration is a hard to justify premise. The go-to justification used, albeit demonstrably false, is that doing so offsets the sub-replacement population growth rate of Europe, forestalling the welfare crisis. This is why I take issue with your stance.
I love the irony of people who will gladly call out entire races for having high levels of crime, but are strangely silent when it is revealed that our "better halves" are the cause, as well as the people preventing it being solved.
What was the black crime rate before women backstabbed all the men in their entire race (boy, that sounds familiar, doesn't it.) for LBJ checks?
Nothing is better for your society than massive population growth, just ask China.
/s
Right, because that's what China's problem is, their population. Not the fact that they're run by Communists.
Their population was such an issue that the Communists forced them to have less kids, saying everyone would starve to death.
Imagine that in Europe, the screeching about men "controlling" women would be absolutely deafening and we'd all end up actually starving to death because of their unwillingness to do anything for society.
Everyone was going to starve to death because the communist party screwed up and killed anyone good at farming causing food shortages. The issues wasn’t over population but central planning caused food shortages.
Nothing is better for a society than the productive, desirable groups forgoing population maintenance to compensate for the undesirable groups outbreeding them at an alarming rate.
If you want less criminals, deal with single mothers. It's not a race thing.
If wanting European ethnic groups and culture to remain dominant in Europe makes me a white nationalist, then sure.
Entirely ignoring race, mass importing members of societies with fundamentally different cultures, religions, values and norms who fail to meet the criteria for legal immigration is a hard to justify premise. The go-to justification used, albeit demonstrably false, is that doing so offsets the sub-replacement population growth rate of Europe, forestalling the welfare crisis. This is why I take issue with your stance.
It's possible for something to have more than one cause.
I love the irony of people who will gladly call out entire races for having high levels of crime, but are strangely silent when it is revealed that our "better halves" are the cause, as well as the people preventing it being solved.
What was the black crime rate before women backstabbed all the men in their entire race (boy, that sounds familiar, doesn't it.) for LBJ checks?