“There is some evidence that vaccination may make illness less severe.”
Just take a moment to admire that they have ABSOLUTELY NO EVIDENCE for this statement, and yet they feel comfortable sharing it despite it being scientifically untrue.
Scientists might be the most overpaid profession in the USA at the moment.
When it comes to putting highly rushed experimental measures into my body, I know I always like going with weasel words, they raise so much more confidence than solid declarations.
They don't need evidence to say "some things may, maybe, possibly, make something slightly less than expected, maybe". Because for one, that's an opinion, and for two, the opinion is so wishy-washy that it could pass talking about literally anything.
Watch:
"There is some evidence that dinosaur bones may make bone broth soup less palatable."
No basis in fact, random statement, but still, it's technically true! At least one piece of evidence which may or may not be contradicted by other evidence MIGHT, not does, but MIGHT make the soup it is added to less palatable. How much less? Is it still palatable? Who knows!
All else being equal, does it really make any difference? If you can't spread COVID and don't require medical attention, who cares if you've got COVID?
That's why this whole vaccine business is a hazardous, deadly scam: No proper PIII trial testing, zero longitudinal peer reviewed control studies, and more complications from side-effects that no one (who didn't have a co-morbidity) suffered from catching COVID.
Well, it makes sense. I looked up "covid antibody test" on our lord and savior Google a couple days back, and because I did it in English I got Ontario results (the language police are really cracking down I guess), but found something neat!
"The COVID-19 antibody test currently offered by LifeLabs cannot detect antibodies generated after vaccination." (obviously the source is LifeLabs)
COVID antibodies, and Strictly-Speaking-Not-A-Vaccine-But-People-Keep-Calling-It-One-Because-It-Is-Somewhat-Similar antibodies, are not the same thing. Tests for COVID antibodies... Will not find antibodies created by the Vaxx. Find me 4000 people in Massachusetts who had COVID twice, beating the natural antibodies... I'll wait, better get a nice chair, because it'll be a LONG wait. Find me 400. Hell, find me 40.
Replying to myself because edits don't work: This is not to say that vaccines don't cause ANY immunity. Just noting a peculiarity in the formation of natural vs artificial "immunity". And how much like natural vs artificial flavors, sometimes you can tell the difference.
Just take a moment to admire that they have ABSOLUTELY NO EVIDENCE for this statement, and yet they feel comfortable sharing it despite it being scientifically untrue.
Scientists might be the most overpaid profession in the USA at the moment.
"some". "may". "less".
"clear". "will". "not".
When it comes to putting highly rushed experimental measures into my body, I know I always like going with weasel words, they raise so much more confidence than solid declarations.
They don't need evidence to say "some things may, maybe, possibly, make something slightly less than expected, maybe". Because for one, that's an opinion, and for two, the opinion is so wishy-washy that it could pass talking about literally anything.
Watch:
"There is some evidence that dinosaur bones may make bone broth soup less palatable."
No basis in fact, random statement, but still, it's technically true! At least one piece of evidence which may or may not be contradicted by other evidence MIGHT, not does, but MIGHT make the soup it is added to less palatable. How much less? Is it still palatable? Who knows!
All else being equal, does it really make any difference? If you can't spread COVID and don't require medical attention, who cares if you've got COVID?
Nope.
That's why this whole vaccine business is a hazardous, deadly scam: No proper PIII trial testing, zero longitudinal peer reviewed control studies, and more complications from side-effects that no one (who didn't have a co-morbidity) suffered from catching COVID.
Well, it makes sense. I looked up "covid antibody test" on our lord and savior Google a couple days back, and because I did it in English I got Ontario results (the language police are really cracking down I guess), but found something neat!
"The COVID-19 antibody test currently offered by LifeLabs cannot detect antibodies generated after vaccination." (obviously the source is LifeLabs)
COVID antibodies, and Strictly-Speaking-Not-A-Vaccine-But-People-Keep-Calling-It-One-Because-It-Is-Somewhat-Similar antibodies, are not the same thing. Tests for COVID antibodies... Will not find antibodies created by the Vaxx. Find me 4000 people in Massachusetts who had COVID twice, beating the natural antibodies... I'll wait, better get a nice chair, because it'll be a LONG wait. Find me 400. Hell, find me 40.
Replying to myself because edits don't work: This is not to say that vaccines don't cause ANY immunity. Just noting a peculiarity in the formation of natural vs artificial "immunity". And how much like natural vs artificial flavors, sometimes you can tell the difference.