Turns out the answer is the shots don't work. Kids with the MMR vax keep getting measles. So the CDC logic is, if one shot doesn't work, you need two, or three, or more. Sounds familiar.
This has always been the case. Before you head off into anti-vax land, the way vaccines work is they give you one shot, and after a couple of weeks an x amount of the population are supposedly immunized from the disease, but it's not always the case.
So you're given a "booster" / second dose, which is supposed to cover the rest of the population who don't get fully immunized after the first dose.
This is also why you get a booster for some vaccines 5-10 years after the case, because your immunization against the virus tends to fade over time (your body kinda "forgets" how to make it, I think?). Considering the alternatives, it's a small price to pay, and most importantly compared to this UNTESTED VACCINE there's solid data behind these older vaccines like the MMR. They know what to expect and know how it works.
The reason why even people like Bret Weinstein is pushing back against the mRNA vaccines is because of the limited scientific data around it. Nobody has proper answers to it, at all, and we're all supposed to be putting all our chips on the table around it and potentially cause harm to people for it?
During normal situations they don't rush out a drug that's untested with no known info about its long term consequences to millions of people, so how in any way is it scientifically, no, ETHICALLY moral to fucking do it? Even during a pandemic for something that isn't dropping people as much as initial estimates claim it should?
On reddit a couple/few years ago it was anti-vax all over the front page. I remember distinctly at the time being so confused by it - most people will never meet a hardcore anti-vaxxer, and even if you do, they aren't really putting anyone but themselves at risk.
BUT THAT DIDN'T MATTER TO REDDIT, and it was drilled into everyone "anti-vax = as stupid as flat-earth creationists" -- and so that same crusade was carried on to this new "vaccine." -- if you question it you're a retarded anti-vaxxer.
It's kind of amazing reddit had that trend 12-24 months before this became relevant for real, huh? But it was totally not planned at all.
Has to make you wonder, were the vaccines over the last Century merely a Trojan Horse meant to make the populous compliant and accept new jab treatments when deemed advisable by the state regardless of the risks?
This the current state of doctors, medical experts and public health officials.
So sad to see that the field of medicine generally consists of only experimental vaccine cultists and spineless cowards that are too afraid to speak up.
There were a few Canadian physicians on Twitter that posted letters they received from local Public Health units after they had reported adverse effects in their patients who had received the vaccine.
The letters essentially said "Thank you for your reports of adverse effects. We have reviewed your submissions and deemed that these reported effects don't fit our criteria of expected symptoms and thus will not counted as such"
"We've taken the liberty of contacting your patients directly and advising them to proceed with their second dose on schedule"
There's zero chance these Public Health units requested medical records, examined patients in person or ordered any diagnostic tests.
It really makes you question how we would ever know the true rates of adverse effects if bureaucrats can decide what gets recorded and what doesn't.
Hearing how the doctors and nurses treated your completely valid concerns for your daughter after a vaccine injury just pisses me off.
Congrats on being a great father! Very few parents these days are capable of critical thinking skills.
Sorry to hear what your family went through. I hope all of your children will remain healthy!
The vaccination schedules for kids these days are completely fucked.
Decades ago when I was a kid, there were very few required vaccines.
This has always been the case. Before you head off into anti-vax land, the way vaccines work is they give you one shot, and after a couple of weeks an x amount of the population are supposedly immunized from the disease, but it's not always the case.
So you're given a "booster" / second dose, which is supposed to cover the rest of the population who don't get fully immunized after the first dose.
This is also why you get a booster for some vaccines 5-10 years after the case, because your immunization against the virus tends to fade over time (your body kinda "forgets" how to make it, I think?). Considering the alternatives, it's a small price to pay, and most importantly compared to this UNTESTED VACCINE there's solid data behind these older vaccines like the MMR. They know what to expect and know how it works.
The reason why even people like Bret Weinstein is pushing back against the mRNA vaccines is because of the limited scientific data around it. Nobody has proper answers to it, at all, and we're all supposed to be putting all our chips on the table around it and potentially cause harm to people for it?
During normal situations they don't rush out a drug that's untested with no known info about its long term consequences to millions of people, so how in any way is it scientifically, no, ETHICALLY moral to fucking do it? Even during a pandemic for something that isn't dropping people as much as initial estimates claim it should?
On reddit a couple/few years ago it was anti-vax all over the front page. I remember distinctly at the time being so confused by it - most people will never meet a hardcore anti-vaxxer, and even if you do, they aren't really putting anyone but themselves at risk.
BUT THAT DIDN'T MATTER TO REDDIT, and it was drilled into everyone "anti-vax = as stupid as flat-earth creationists" -- and so that same crusade was carried on to this new "vaccine." -- if you question it you're a retarded anti-vaxxer.
It's kind of amazing reddit had that trend 12-24 months before this became relevant for real, huh? But it was totally not planned at all.
Has to make you wonder, were the vaccines over the last Century merely a Trojan Horse meant to make the populous compliant and accept new jab treatments when deemed advisable by the state regardless of the risks?
This the current state of doctors, medical experts and public health officials.
So sad to see that the field of medicine generally consists of only experimental vaccine cultists and spineless cowards that are too afraid to speak up.
There were a few Canadian physicians on Twitter that posted letters they received from local Public Health units after they had reported adverse effects in their patients who had received the vaccine.
The letters essentially said "Thank you for your reports of adverse effects. We have reviewed your submissions and deemed that these reported effects don't fit our criteria of expected symptoms and thus will not counted as such"
"We've taken the liberty of contacting your patients directly and advising them to proceed with their second dose on schedule"
There's zero chance these Public Health units requested medical records, examined patients in person or ordered any diagnostic tests.
It really makes you question how we would ever know the true rates of adverse effects if bureaucrats can decide what gets recorded and what doesn't.