Also, are you sure that’s right? I swear I heard the guy was Muslim, but his motive was to martyr himself to avoid judgement from Allah for being gay.
You did hear that. They constructed an entire false narrative in order to blame the shooting on 'gun violence' and 'American homophobia', as opposed to the ISIS-inspired terrorism that it actually was.
Speaking of short memories, no one ever held them accountable for that.
There’s two groups of people in this world who I always end up having lower and lower expectations of : women and journalists.
I think journalists just eclipsed them. Covering for a terrorist that doesn’t even share their views and attacked their supposed allies is a new low.
I did find your comment about boycotting interesting, but I haven’t replied yet. I dropped my phone (again) and now I’m using something so small I can barely type or read long posts, until it’s repaired.
If there’s one thing I’d like to say on that point while I’m making seven typos a sentence, it’s that our lack of memory or a cohesive and maintained archive is one of our biggest issues.
There’s two groups of people in this world who I always end up having lower and lower expectations of : women and journalists.
Well, I have very high expectations of journalists. I expect them to lie, cheat, steal, deceive, incite racial hatred.
Covering for a terrorist that doesn’t even share their views and attacked their supposed allies is a new low.
Though allies are just pawns for intersectionalist ideology, in this case it was a win-win for everyone. Muslims, a class more sacred than homosexuals, because ISIS was not blamed. Homosexuals, at least the rabid activists, because instead of this being pinned on ISIS, which the activists do not care about, it was pinned on 'American homophobia', which can help them gain more power.
If there’s one thing I’d like to say on that point while I’m making seven typos a sentence, it’s that our lack of memory or a cohesive and maintained archive is one of our biggest issues.
I have been trying to fix that for a while. That is actually why I questioned you in DMs about your archiving behaviors a while back. I have created a small archive of dirt. But there is only so much one man can do, even with parts of the tasks automated.
You did hear that. They constructed an entire false narrative in order to blame the shooting on 'gun violence' and 'American homophobia', as opposed to the ISIS-inspired terrorism that it actually was.
Speaking of short memories, no one ever held them accountable for that.
There’s two groups of people in this world who I always end up having lower and lower expectations of : women and journalists.
I think journalists just eclipsed them. Covering for a terrorist that doesn’t even share their views and attacked their supposed allies is a new low.
I did find your comment about boycotting interesting, but I haven’t replied yet. I dropped my phone (again) and now I’m using something so small I can barely type or read long posts, until it’s repaired.
If there’s one thing I’d like to say on that point while I’m making seven typos a sentence, it’s that our lack of memory or a cohesive and maintained archive is one of our biggest issues.
I have good news for you! Most shit journalists are women, or have so little testosterone they might as well be.
Well, I have very high expectations of journalists. I expect them to lie, cheat, steal, deceive, incite racial hatred.
Though allies are just pawns for intersectionalist ideology, in this case it was a win-win for everyone. Muslims, a class more sacred than homosexuals, because ISIS was not blamed. Homosexuals, at least the rabid activists, because instead of this being pinned on ISIS, which the activists do not care about, it was pinned on 'American homophobia', which can help them gain more power.
I have been trying to fix that for a while. That is actually why I questioned you in DMs about your archiving behaviors a while back. I have created a small archive of dirt. But there is only so much one man can do, even with parts of the tasks automated.