17 Years Ago Today: "I was always willing to be reasonable until I had to be unreasonable"
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (64)
sorted by:
So you agree with BLM that property destruction is fine.
This is some motherly "violence is never the answer" horseshit. Killdozer did nothing wrong.
So property destruction is wrong, unless it's for a cause you like.
How exactly do you differ from BLM?
Being correct for starters. Are you really so infantile as to think destruction and violence is never warranted?
That is quite a nice case of special pleading. Destruction and mayhem is justified if you believe it is 'correct'. But everyone thinks that he is correct, so I guess it is justified in all cases. BLM thinks it's correct.
That is a different argument than the one OP made, which was that it doesn't matter since it's just 'property'. Get your story straight.