What sort of traditions? It looks like liberal ones to me.
The traditions that made the West great. Namely, those of Christianity - actually, the synthesis of Christianity with Greco-Roman civilization and the early Enlightement.
I see you still think elections are useful, big mistake. Ethno-nationalism is the winner because that's what will get whites to understand how dire our situation is and withdraw from the system to build our own institutions. In order to survive, we must become a nation within a nation.
If you have no way to exert pressure on political authorities, you're doomed before you even started.
Now compare the MENA to places with white majorities.
MENA is a shithole because of Islam. If it's white that make a place like England great, then it's pretty odd that before the Roman conquest and after the legions left, it was a hive of barbarism, to the point that Cicero told people not to buy slaves from England as they were very stupid, and that even a Muslim said that the more north you go in Europe, the paler the people get, and also the dumber they get.
Again, whatever theory you adopt has to explain stuff not just in the present, but in the past as well.
The justification for a ton of brutal colonial projects was seeing the colonial subjects as lesser. Your little quote is probably pretty meaningless. I doubt there was really a serious commitment to treat any of these people as equals.
Of course, colonialism was not done for the good of the ruled, as government does not exist for the good of the ruled, but for the good of the ruler. But as a side-effect, it did have the effect of being good for the ruled. And as a matter of fact, the Indians were at a lower level of cultural development in the 19th century than the British, and it would have been good if they had adopted the parts of British culture that made it the ruler of the world.
It's also funny to me that you are pro-colonialism yet constantly moralize about "stormfags."
How so? I favor colonialism because I think it was good for the ruled, while Stormfags hate anyone who is a Jew or not white.
If there were a budding white nationalist movement on colleges, they would snuff it out as they've done everywhere else.
It's almost as if they want it though. It relieves them of having to tilt at windmills.
It's funny you're saying that given Thomas's own past suspicions about "colorblind" white liberals.
A recent book, from what I have gathered, argues that Thomas is a crypto black nationalist. It makes sense, if you want blacks to actually succeed, you would do that in the way Thomas does, not by begging your white masters for a boon.
I am. But like Polybius, I recognize the dangers of attacking the foundation of a civilization.
No, the idea is to escape their authority. It's not guaranteed to work, but alternatives are guaranteed to fail.
You can't escape their authority. But they are easily pressured, as we have seen. Mostly by billionaires and lobbyists, but rational people can adopt the same methods. Moreover, if you're not using the law, how are you going to get your blacks expelled, or whatever you want to do with them?
Feel free to pick anywhere else in the world, then.
Clearly, Japan is a shithole because people are not white enough.
It's not like shit develops over night, and the Roman empire died anyway. Maybe they shouldn't have underestimated the northern European intellect :D
It didn't take much intellect to destroy. No empire lasts forever. Including Western civilization which is currently in the process of committing suicide.
I thought Islam is what ruined MENA. If Islam is so ruinous, why do you think those Muslims were so smart?
Sapping the life force of the civilizations of the east, the most prosperous, civilized and urbanized areas of the Roman Empire. Now look at them.
Your main motivation is for your non-white self
That makes little sense, as I am far closer to you than the average white person is. Like TheImpossible1, you can't conceive of someone who doesn't think in terms of categories that you are obsessed by. There's plenty that's more important than race, like religion.
Good luck asserting that whites are a group whose future matters and has a distinct interest.
That doesn't sound that bad. It's mostly your 'solutions' that are bad.
Why didn't we stupid "stormfags" think of throwing our billions of dollars around?
You're unable to persuade anyone, and you don't have any money. And yet you want to 'escape' their authority. I guess it lines up well with the rest of your ideology, which also makes zero sense.
You keep floating things you think haven't been tried because you don't give enough shits about the future of whites to look at the history of white advocacy.
'White advocacy' is retarded. You aspire to be the Jesse Jackson of white people, and it's quite pathetic.
I never said all non-white countries are shitholes. Japan is very different from white countries, even after American influence on it post-WWII.
Obviously, it's a different culture. And that has nothing at all to do with the race of the people.
The average white person has an in-group bias toward their fellow whites.
Is that why you like your dangerhairs better than a Clarence Thomas? It seems to me that rather than an anti-wokeist flowing into racialism, you're a racial identitarian posing as an anti-wokeist.
The ideologies largely serve to muddle things and get people to act against their interests.
Or maybe, just maybe, some people don't want to be retarded. It may be in my "interests" to get on the woke bandwagon, but I'd prefer an actual civilization over the Lord of the Flies with racial groups fighting over spoils that you and the SJWs favor.
There's plenty of Christianity in Africa. How is that working out?
Quite well, in relative terms. Africa is starting out behind, but I think 100 years from now, Africa may be ahead of Europe and America, due to the civilizational collapse taking place there. There are some problems, like a great amount of ethnic "diversity", and countries that don't have it like Botswana do better.
The traditions that made the West great. Namely, those of Christianity - actually, the synthesis of Christianity with Greco-Roman civilization and the early Enlightement.
If you have no way to exert pressure on political authorities, you're doomed before you even started.
MENA is a shithole because of Islam. If it's white that make a place like England great, then it's pretty odd that before the Roman conquest and after the legions left, it was a hive of barbarism, to the point that Cicero told people not to buy slaves from England as they were very stupid, and that even a Muslim said that the more north you go in Europe, the paler the people get, and also the dumber they get.
Again, whatever theory you adopt has to explain stuff not just in the present, but in the past as well.
Of course, colonialism was not done for the good of the ruled, as government does not exist for the good of the ruled, but for the good of the ruler. But as a side-effect, it did have the effect of being good for the ruled. And as a matter of fact, the Indians were at a lower level of cultural development in the 19th century than the British, and it would have been good if they had adopted the parts of British culture that made it the ruler of the world.
How so? I favor colonialism because I think it was good for the ruled, while Stormfags hate anyone who is a Jew or not white.
It's almost as if they want it though. It relieves them of having to tilt at windmills.
A recent book, from what I have gathered, argues that Thomas is a crypto black nationalist. It makes sense, if you want blacks to actually succeed, you would do that in the way Thomas does, not by begging your white masters for a boon.
I am. But like Polybius, I recognize the dangers of attacking the foundation of a civilization.
You can't escape their authority. But they are easily pressured, as we have seen. Mostly by billionaires and lobbyists, but rational people can adopt the same methods. Moreover, if you're not using the law, how are you going to get your blacks expelled, or whatever you want to do with them?
Clearly, Japan is a shithole because people are not white enough.
It didn't take much intellect to destroy. No empire lasts forever. Including Western civilization which is currently in the process of committing suicide.
Sapping the life force of the civilizations of the east, the most prosperous, civilized and urbanized areas of the Roman Empire. Now look at them.
That makes little sense, as I am far closer to you than the average white person is. Like TheImpossible1, you can't conceive of someone who doesn't think in terms of categories that you are obsessed by. There's plenty that's more important than race, like religion.
That doesn't sound that bad. It's mostly your 'solutions' that are bad.
You have no chance of 'escaping' their authority.
You're unable to persuade anyone, and you don't have any money. And yet you want to 'escape' their authority. I guess it lines up well with the rest of your ideology, which also makes zero sense.
'White advocacy' is retarded. You aspire to be the Jesse Jackson of white people, and it's quite pathetic.
Obviously, it's a different culture. And that has nothing at all to do with the race of the people.
Is that why you like your dangerhairs better than a Clarence Thomas? It seems to me that rather than an anti-wokeist flowing into racialism, you're a racial identitarian posing as an anti-wokeist.
Or maybe, just maybe, some people don't want to be retarded. It may be in my "interests" to get on the woke bandwagon, but I'd prefer an actual civilization over the Lord of the Flies with racial groups fighting over spoils that you and the SJWs favor.
Quite well, in relative terms. Africa is starting out behind, but I think 100 years from now, Africa may be ahead of Europe and America, due to the civilizational collapse taking place there. There are some problems, like a great amount of ethnic "diversity", and countries that don't have it like Botswana do better.