That's one unlucky surrogate motherfucker
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (48)
sorted by:
It's not just me, a lot of people know BLM is led by women.
Is it though? Are you telling me you've never known someone whose politics surprised you?
You can't win as their target unless you have fuck you money.
The motivation is to destroy you, their "friend".
Women can also be black and try to extract benefits on account of their race.
We're not talking about politics. We're talking about people who believe that 'the personal is political'. Of course you will not be able to interact with such a person without knowing full well what he is.
Sure you can. In fact, you may win if you are not in a high position precisely because of that, because that makes you a less appealing target. There will be less of an incentive to take you out. They will move on sooner.
Friendships with SJWs are impossible, precisely because they will gladly destroy you for their virtue-signaling. That said, they are not going to play the long game. There are no undercover SJWs. They're incapable of hiding what they are.
The many paragraphs in their manifesto dedicated to misogyny are just a coincidence.
Feminism is politics. You're mixing things up, of course the screeching retards you see at women's marches won't be able to hide it, but those who silently support it, those who vote for more - those women are who you should fear.
A sex allegation ends your career forever.
I don't agree. I believe that there are people who hold those views but can appear to be sane and normal individuals.
Like I said, put aside your own prejudices and preconceived notions and just look at it objectively.
And they will say the same about you. You make the mistake of thinking that they are even aware of all this. Hell, I was not even aware of this, nor will anyone be who is not obsessively following it.
But if people have to be irredeemably evil to support Biden, that doesn't bode well for the future, does it - since he got at least 50%? Unless you think the younger generations are going to be less irredeemably evil, it's only going to get worse.
Then you simply don't provide that. But this is the problem with having no employment protections. Companies can turn their back on your as soon as you become a liability.
They're not though. Being able to convincingly hide your views is not easy, especially for cartoon character ideologues like your average feminist. Not that they would if they could. And they're certainly not going to do it in order to become 'friends' with you to screw you over.
I don't get it.
I am, the timing was so suspicious that the motive I gave it makes more sense than anything. Why would they start using "birthing people" around the one day where everyone thinks about the woman they care about most?
Well, he got 50% if you believe the vote count. I don't. I cannot believe that more black men turned out for the 0.1% candidate and her sidekick than Obama.
Every job I've ever had forces you to provide it. No matter what country you're in, that's the norm.
You have a way higher opinion of them than I do, clearly. I consider them a form of diabolical evil that will do anything to destroy a target.
Telling women you're a Trump supporter will get you in a bad situation, in my opinion. TD is wrong for advocating it.
It's called intersectionality. Every single leftist movement is dedicated to the exact same thing, race/identity pimping and their environment nuttery. If you put aside your prejudices for a moment, and your preconceived notions, and you saw that pro-abortion groups are now talking about 'birthing people', you would soon realize who is in charge.
Au contraire. Those are people who do not have a deep-seated commitment, but who are manipulated (mostly) or vote for those people for different reasons.
No, it doesn't. How is it going to get enough press to do that, if one is a nobody?
That would require them to be able to accurately predict what normal people would say in certain situations and say that instead of what they believe. They believe that people who believe that are "Nazis". They're not going to be able to speak like they believe that, let alone state that these views are their own.
I addressed the birthing people idea before. It was brought up around Mother's Day to galvanize support for a female supremacy bill.
Yeah, I don't believe that. I believe the opposition to be irredeemably flawed. You can't see what they stood for last year and go "Yeah, I want that." without being a fucked up person. They had Donna Hylton speak on video at Harris' confirmation!
When one has to provide a reference of one's last job, one will realize quickly. (God, I sound like Prince Charles.)
This doesn't seem far fetched to me. Considering their tactics are built around treachery, being able to hide their views is a key part of that. This is why I believe the idea that TD has of finding a woman that supports Trump by being open about it, is probably the best way to get either robbed, doxxed or accused of rape.