A person can't simultaneously be "grrr jews are behind it" and "wait no, I'm not saying they have a conspiracy".
As I see it, they're either in or out on it, and if they're not all in then their animosity makes no sense.
Basically, I'm saying that any antisemite who backtracks and says they don't think there's a conspiracy, is lying. And they're lying because when forced to scrutinize it, the more ridiculous it actually is and how stupid they'd look if they said they do believe there's a conspiracy.
So you look for the dumbest version of an argument you can find, then present that as the entire argument.
I don't see how their position works otherwise.
A person can't simultaneously be "grrr jews are behind it" and "wait no, I'm not saying they have a conspiracy".
As I see it, they're either in or out on it, and if they're not all in then their animosity makes no sense.
Basically, I'm saying that any antisemite who backtracks and says they don't think there's a conspiracy, is lying. And they're lying because when forced to scrutinize it, the more ridiculous it actually is and how stupid they'd look if they said they do believe there's a conspiracy.