You should know by now, feminists rarely openly and publicly say what they want for us. They drop little hints as a sort of fun game for their side, but they never openly declare it. They hide behind such tactics as pretending their calls for violence are twisted humor, claiming that their societal plan is a mere thought experiment and not a plan at all and the "it's about women's rights" lie.
Ideological crusades seem more popular for major corporations than profit-making efforts.
Well, if you believe a lower population would result in economic collapse, a compromise they could make is to accept a more fair family court structure.
But it doesn't. Maybe hundreds of years ago, but economically, societally and militarily, women are a massive liability. Their value is artificially inflated by decades of propaganda.
Lowering the amount of men chasing them forces them to either be single forever or act like human beings. Over time, their ego trip will subside and they won't be so self-centered and awful...hopefully.
You should know by now, feminists rarely openly and publicly say what they want for us.
There's a bit of a double game that you're playing, that whenever some feminist, somewhere, says something that you would like to pin on the group, you claim that they are admitting that they want to kill you, or whatever, while if it is inconvenient, you say that they don't really say what they want and that only you can decipher it.
It's not there. It's close to impossible that it would happen.
Ideological crusades seem more popular for major corporations than profit-making efforts.
They're following the path of least resistance. Particularly a more traditional company like MC rather than Twitter.
Well, if you believe a lower population would result in economic collapse, a compromise they could make is to accept a more fair family court structure.
What you believe to be 'fair' is quite unfair for women, unfortunately.
But it doesn't. Maybe hundreds of years ago, but economically, societally and militarily, women are a massive liability. Their value is artificially inflated by decades of propaganda.
Can you point me to all the societies that did much better without this 'massive liability'? Like it or dislike it like Hesiod, fact is that a society can't reproduce without women, and that the reproduction rate is limited by the number of women and not men.
Lowering the amount of men chasing them forces them to either be single forever or act like human beings. Over time, their ego trip will subside and they won't be so self-centered and awful...hopefully.
I don't agree that "they" are awful. They're not committing 98% of the murders and rapes. Those who are awful, are generally bitter single catladies addicted to boxed wine.
A lot of things that were claimed to be just insane and ridiculous of their ideology ended up happening.
Why didn't Visa join in? It was only Mastercard that blocked payments.
Well, their love for fairness never extended to anyone else, so let's call it reparations and be done with it.
We're in 2021. Just fund some scientists to create a way to reproduce without them and claim it's to help gays.
Do you really want to go all 13/50 on me? I don't really want a race debate. The fact is, very few groups have been as sadistic in their psychological abuse as women have, towards adults and children.
You should know by now, feminists rarely openly and publicly say what they want for us. They drop little hints as a sort of fun game for their side, but they never openly declare it. They hide behind such tactics as pretending their calls for violence are twisted humor, claiming that their societal plan is a mere thought experiment and not a plan at all and the "it's about women's rights" lie.
Ideological crusades seem more popular for major corporations than profit-making efforts.
Well, if you believe a lower population would result in economic collapse, a compromise they could make is to accept a more fair family court structure.
But it doesn't. Maybe hundreds of years ago, but economically, societally and militarily, women are a massive liability. Their value is artificially inflated by decades of propaganda.
Lowering the amount of men chasing them forces them to either be single forever or act like human beings. Over time, their ego trip will subside and they won't be so self-centered and awful...hopefully.
There's a bit of a double game that you're playing, that whenever some feminist, somewhere, says something that you would like to pin on the group, you claim that they are admitting that they want to kill you, or whatever, while if it is inconvenient, you say that they don't really say what they want and that only you can decipher it.
It's not there. It's close to impossible that it would happen.
They're following the path of least resistance. Particularly a more traditional company like MC rather than Twitter.
What you believe to be 'fair' is quite unfair for women, unfortunately.
Can you point me to all the societies that did much better without this 'massive liability'? Like it or dislike it like Hesiod, fact is that a society can't reproduce without women, and that the reproduction rate is limited by the number of women and not men.
I don't agree that "they" are awful. They're not committing 98% of the murders and rapes. Those who are awful, are generally bitter single catladies addicted to boxed wine.
A lot of things that were claimed to be just insane and ridiculous of their ideology ended up happening.
Why didn't Visa join in? It was only Mastercard that blocked payments.
Well, their love for fairness never extended to anyone else, so let's call it reparations and be done with it.
We're in 2021. Just fund some scientists to create a way to reproduce without them and claim it's to help gays.
Do you really want to go all 13/50 on me? I don't really want a race debate. The fact is, very few groups have been as sadistic in their psychological abuse as women have, towards adults and children.