How exactly do you 'lose out' from making work more flexible?
It's retarded to do it for reasons of 'gender equity' as the BBC says, but it's a pretty great thing when possible.
But this was very interesting:
"From a demographic point of view, none of this actually needs to be a problem," says Prof George Leeson of the Oxford Institute of Population Ageing.
Fertility rates in western Europe have been below replacement level since the 1970s but populations have continued to grow. "The population has just been refreshed and replenished by migration," he says.
And falling populations can have positive effects in terms of climate change. "At the moment the fact that we're not having as many children as our parents and grandparents did is giving the global village a bit of a breathing space," says Prof Leeson.
Impossible has glommed on to the "stormcucks" meme so fucking hard in an effort to make his pathological anti-woman obsession seem less insane. "I hate women with the burning passion of a thousand suns, but at least I'm not mildly anti-Semitic!"
Watching he and Antonio bond over their mutual dislike of the JQ crowd is so heartwarming. Nothing brings people together like shared hatred for an idea that conflicts with their own individual explanations for all the problems. Don't worry if those individual explanations regularly contradict each other. Such minor disagreements can always be put aside to run defensive cover for people so oppressed that criticizing them is literally a hate crime.
Young women being so intolerable and self-centered that nobody wants to start a family with them is not a conspiracy.
It makes sense that an economy built around growth would import people to get around that issue. Confronting it would get women and the men they raised voting the entire government out.
It doesn't have to be a conspiracy. Our social elites' anti-life world view is enough. Presumably if the third world is actually able to back fill our society successfully they'll get ground up too and have to be replaced as well.
If you read it, you'd see they say that giving it to men has no effect, so we wouldn't get it. We'd just have to work the extra hours.
I read it twice and I am not sure where you got that.
Anyway, that would be bad for women's employment opportunities. You can't give a group extra rights without simultaneously hurting it. If a company hiring a female worker will have additional costs imposed on it, but not with a male worker, the market dictates that male workers will be more attractive one way or another - in the worst case with the companies hiring more female workers going out of business.
Oh God, that highlighted text will attract all the stormcucks.
Well, it does sound extremely dodgy. Not just that he cheers the replacement of native Europeans by (Islamic) immigrants, but also in that he simultaneously says that demographic decline is not a problem because immigration, and because it's actually good for his global warming cult.
Working from home women found they could spend more time with their children and they choose to have more. The same effect wasn't found in women with lower levels of education or with men.
Here, they tried to bury it.
You're forgetting that women are the most over-privileged group in the world, with innumerable amounts of laws protecting them, power positions in their control and a friendly media. Any attempt to mitigate their privileges' effect would be met with being blacklisted from stock exchanges, being dragged through shit by the media and being blocked from processing payments by Mastercard.
They're saying that they can maintain the population growth needed for economic stimulus through immigration, but eventually this will stop working and they'll then pivot to "the population is crashing, but that's a good thing because climate change" instead of daring to challenge society's most privileged and uncompromising group.
It's not saying that only women should have that privilege. Hell, I bet that would be impossible, just like with the 'male curfew'. Can you imagine a company that says that only women can work flexibly? Maybe mothers, but that's pushing it.
You're forgetting that women are the most over-privileged group in the world
You forgot that I don't believe that. Plenty who come before them.
and being blocked from processing payments by Mastercard.
This isn't about your conspiracy theory that some random woman at Mastercard blocked PornHub, which you asserted without evidence, in order to help OnlyFans, which you also asserted without evidence - and not because Pornhub was involved in a massive scandal over child pornography?
instead of daring to challenge society's most privileged and uncompromising group.
I mean, even in your theory and worldview, they are 'compromising' by allowing rape gangs to operate freely so that Muslims will vote for Labour.
How exactly do you 'lose out' from making work more flexible?
It's retarded to do it for reasons of 'gender equity' as the BBC says, but it's a pretty great thing when possible.
But this was very interesting:
Complete batshit.
If you read it, you'd see they say that giving it to men has no effect, so we wouldn't get it. We'd just have to work the extra hours.
Oh God, that highlighted text will attract all the stormcucks.
"White genocide is real! REEEEEEEE!"
Yes, why believe that they are doing what they outright say they are doing?
Impossible has glommed on to the "stormcucks" meme so fucking hard in an effort to make his pathological anti-woman obsession seem less insane. "I hate women with the burning passion of a thousand suns, but at least I'm not mildly anti-Semitic!"
Watching he and Antonio bond over their mutual dislike of the JQ crowd is so heartwarming. Nothing brings people together like shared hatred for an idea that conflicts with their own individual explanations for all the problems. Don't worry if those individual explanations regularly contradict each other. Such minor disagreements can always be put aside to run defensive cover for people so oppressed that criticizing them is literally a hate crime.
Says the person defending women.
Who literally advocate that "misogyny" should be a hate crime.
Young women being so intolerable and self-centered that nobody wants to start a family with them is not a conspiracy.
It makes sense that an economy built around growth would import people to get around that issue. Confronting it would get women and the men they raised voting the entire government out.
It doesn't have to be a conspiracy. Our social elites' anti-life world view is enough. Presumably if the third world is actually able to back fill our society successfully they'll get ground up too and have to be replaced as well.
I read it twice and I am not sure where you got that.
Anyway, that would be bad for women's employment opportunities. You can't give a group extra rights without simultaneously hurting it. If a company hiring a female worker will have additional costs imposed on it, but not with a male worker, the market dictates that male workers will be more attractive one way or another - in the worst case with the companies hiring more female workers going out of business.
Well, it does sound extremely dodgy. Not just that he cheers the replacement of native Europeans by (Islamic) immigrants, but also in that he simultaneously says that demographic decline is not a problem because immigration, and because it's actually good for his global warming cult.
Which is it?
Here, they tried to bury it.
You're forgetting that women are the most over-privileged group in the world, with innumerable amounts of laws protecting them, power positions in their control and a friendly media. Any attempt to mitigate their privileges' effect would be met with being blacklisted from stock exchanges, being dragged through shit by the media and being blocked from processing payments by Mastercard.
They're saying that they can maintain the population growth needed for economic stimulus through immigration, but eventually this will stop working and they'll then pivot to "the population is crashing, but that's a good thing because climate change" instead of daring to challenge society's most privileged and uncompromising group.
It's not saying that only women should have that privilege. Hell, I bet that would be impossible, just like with the 'male curfew'. Can you imagine a company that says that only women can work flexibly? Maybe mothers, but that's pushing it.
You forgot that I don't believe that. Plenty who come before them.
This isn't about your conspiracy theory that some random woman at Mastercard blocked PornHub, which you asserted without evidence, in order to help OnlyFans, which you also asserted without evidence - and not because Pornhub was involved in a massive scandal over child pornography?
I mean, even in your theory and worldview, they are 'compromising' by allowing rape gangs to operate freely so that Muslims will vote for Labour.