Don't let leftist relabel their bullshit. It is called global warming. Ask any lefttard why climate change is bad, and they will say more droughts, more storms, and rising sea levels. Ask them what causes those things and they will say higher global temperatures. It is global warming.
Anthropogenic
It is not anthropogenic. This is easy to disprove. The sea levels were 20-40 feet (6m-12m) higher than they are today during Eemian interstadial (the previous glacial retreat, 115000-130000 years ago). This indicates that sea levels have not reached their peak height, and that humans have nothing to do with it.
The more and more dangerous storms meme is based on insurance claims which will always increase due to inflation and more population. To top it off, there have recently been less dangerous storms, disproving the claim directly (the hurricane drought lasted from 2005 to 2017).
As for droughts like those in California:
In her 17-minute video, Ingram noted that her colleague Scott Stine of California State University East Bay found some of the first evidence of a medieval warm period in California by studying the water level of Mono Lake. The lake expands and contracts depending on the amount of runoff from the adjoining Sierra Nevada. Stine’s research reveals a dry spell from 1,800 to 600 years ago. https://ucanr.edu/blogs/blogcore/postdetail.cfm?postnum=13274
1200 year long droughts is the norm for California. The "wet" weather that has been occurring for the past 600 or so will not continue.
Of course the climate "scientist" predict that California will have droughts and that sea levels will rise, so when those things happen they can say that you should listen to them. Much like a medieval Yankee charlatan predicting an eclipse and demanding that he be released or he won't return the sun.
Then there is their manipulative statistical analysis. Take most any set of random or sinusoidal data that is reasonable bounded. For most of the data use a long term moving average, then for the last percent or so use a short moving average. Congratulations! You have just created a hokey stick graph. It might be increasing, it might be decreasing, but it will have a sharp angle where the two moving averages meet. This is "Mike's (Micheal Mann's) Nature trick". Have fun using it to scare people into poverty.
Unless your fucking lying.
Then resign out of disgrace.
There wouldn't be a single climate "scientist" left if that happened.
Feel free to call it either or. Climate Change is a thing, and is frankly the more significant and important thing to recognize. Global Warming is how the Climate is changing, but the genuine effects of Global Warming come through Climate Change.
This is easy to disprove. The sea levels were 20-40 feet (6m-12m) higher than they are today during Eemian interstadial (the previous glacial retreat, 115000-130000 years ago). This indicates that sea levels have not reached their peak height, and that humans have nothing to do with it.
That's an utterly stupid attempt at disproving Climate Change. Anyone who argues (and there were a few) that Climate doesn't change naturally at all is a retard of the highest proportions. Obviously the climate changes naturally, however, it is important to recognize that the human ecosystem has a major impact on the climate.
This is like saying there's no evidence that building a dam causes a river to change course because you have evidence that rivers have changed course without human action before. Obviously rivers change course. However, building dams still changes the course of rivers. Beavers change the course of rivers. Clearly humans can.
Humans, in particularly, are emitting a significant amount of CO2 into the atmosphere which is not part of the normal trend. There consequences of such high CO2 emissions will exist. When you change atmospheric composition, you will get tangible results.
Congratulations! You have just created a hokey stick graph.
Temperature graphs are pretty, but the whole set up for those graphs is extremely difficult to really verify. You can literally just see changing climates.
Don't let leftist relabel their bullshit. It is called global warming. Ask any lefttard why climate change is bad, and they will say more droughts, more storms, and rising sea levels. Ask them what causes those things and they will say higher global temperatures. It is global warming.
It is not anthropogenic. This is easy to disprove. The sea levels were 20-40 feet (6m-12m) higher than they are today during Eemian interstadial (the previous glacial retreat, 115000-130000 years ago). This indicates that sea levels have not reached their peak height, and that humans have nothing to do with it.
It is not a threat. More CO2 helps plants in dryer regions (smaller stomata required means more moisture retention.). More plants means more food. https://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/2016/carbon-dioxide-fertilization-greening-earth
The more and more dangerous storms meme is based on insurance claims which will always increase due to inflation and more population. To top it off, there have recently been less dangerous storms, disproving the claim directly (the hurricane drought lasted from 2005 to 2017).
As for droughts like those in California:
1200 year long droughts is the norm for California. The "wet" weather that has been occurring for the past 600 or so will not continue.
Of course the climate "scientist" predict that California will have droughts and that sea levels will rise, so when those things happen they can say that you should listen to them. Much like a medieval Yankee charlatan predicting an eclipse and demanding that he be released or he won't return the sun.
Then there is their manipulative statistical analysis. Take most any set of random or sinusoidal data that is reasonable bounded. For most of the data use a long term moving average, then for the last percent or so use a short moving average. Congratulations! You have just created a hokey stick graph. It might be increasing, it might be decreasing, but it will have a sharp angle where the two moving averages meet. This is "Mike's (Micheal Mann's) Nature trick". Have fun using it to scare people into poverty.
There wouldn't be a single climate "scientist" left if that happened.
Feel free to call it either or. Climate Change is a thing, and is frankly the more significant and important thing to recognize. Global Warming is how the Climate is changing, but the genuine effects of Global Warming come through Climate Change.
That's an utterly stupid attempt at disproving Climate Change. Anyone who argues (and there were a few) that Climate doesn't change naturally at all is a retard of the highest proportions. Obviously the climate changes naturally, however, it is important to recognize that the human ecosystem has a major impact on the climate.
This is like saying there's no evidence that building a dam causes a river to change course because you have evidence that rivers have changed course without human action before. Obviously rivers change course. However, building dams still changes the course of rivers. Beavers change the course of rivers. Clearly humans can.
Humans, in particularly, are emitting a significant amount of CO2 into the atmosphere which is not part of the normal trend. There consequences of such high CO2 emissions will exist. When you change atmospheric composition, you will get tangible results.
Temperature graphs are pretty, but the whole set up for those graphs is extremely difficult to really verify. You can literally just see changing climates.