Pejorative aside; what's important for control is the -ism; because that is what free will of choice is consenting to by both believing/nor believing the suggestion. Control is not about what one believes, but that one consents to a suggestion by another one. Why? Because to use free will to consent to a suggestion offered by the free will of another; represents ignoring ones own free will aka the sole authority over ONEself within ALL, in favor for the false authority (their free will) of another ONE.
That represents the fundamental deception for control through suggestion...offer meets consent.
Consenting to a suggestion requires belief; belief causes the conflict of reason (truth versus false). The few make suggestions (-isms) to divide (reason) the many.
Who suggested entertainment (enter tame mind) and who consents by free will of choice?
intellectual
IN'TELLECT, noun (Latin intellectus, from intelligo, to understand)...that refers to ONEs comprehension of ALL perceived; not to what ONE consents to believe from the suggestion of another ONE.
Comprehension represents ONEs potential within ALL potentiality, and it's build by choice of action (free will).
Perception (input) to choice based comprehension (processing) to action (output)...that's ONEs conscious communication with ALL.
Pejorative aside; what's important for control is the -ism; because that is what free will of choice is consenting to by both believing/nor believing the suggestion. Control is not about what one believes, but that one consents to a suggestion by another one. Why? Because to use free will to consent to a suggestion offered by the free will of another; represents ignoring ones own free will aka the sole authority over ONEself within ALL, in favor for the false authority (their free will) of another ONE.
That represents the fundamental deception for control through suggestion...offer meets consent.
I'm not sure what you're talking about and it doesn't seem interesting enough to wade through and suss it out with you.
Free-will-of choice is a fucking bot. Hey free will, what’s too human’s worrth of legs minus (-) one ? If you can’t answer that question you’re a bot.
Consenting to a suggestion requires belief; belief causes the conflict of reason (truth versus false). The few make suggestions (-isms) to divide (reason) the many.
The foundation of narrative control.
oh god, we've got a rick and morty intellectual here
I see that cultist pop in here from time to time. And people keep responding to him.
Who suggested entertainment (enter tame mind) and who consents by free will of choice?
IN'TELLECT, noun (Latin intellectus, from intelligo, to understand)...that refers to ONEs comprehension of ALL perceived; not to what ONE consents to believe from the suggestion of another ONE.
Comprehension represents ONEs potential within ALL potentiality, and it's build by choice of action (free will).
Perception (input) to choice based comprehension (processing) to action (output)...that's ONEs conscious communication with ALL.