As you probably know, Trump made his own 1-man Twitter: https://www.donaldjtrump.com/desk
Someone made an account that just posted those to Twitter: https://web.archive.org/web/20210505221655/https://twitter.com/DJTDesk
Leftist started whining to Jack that people could see what the 45th POTUS said, using the hashtag #RemoveTrumpJack: https://web.archive.org/web/20210505235013/https://twitter.com/mmpadellan/status/1390024670120919040
The account is now suspended: https://twitter.com/DJTDesk
I took a look at Trump's website today. It's awful. Barrenness, lack of interaction, and no titles nor descriptions of the content.
Complete dud.
Old dude not internet savvy, film at 11.
Though the lack of interaction is at least slightly understandable. It'd require a whole account UI and you know someone would attack it almost instantly. And heaven forbid there's user avatars since we all know how deep the TDS runs with the types who "happen" to have CP collections.
To be honest, anyone can have a small amount of CP pics with one hour use of TOR.
Or an online friendship with your average Reddit moderator, apparently.
Zing!
Dude's a fucking billionaire, he can afford to hire somebody competent.
Let's be honest: the whole point of this website is so that people take screencaps of what he's saying and post them to twitter. So many that there's no way they can censor everyone.
It's exactly like the press releases he was putting out: he puts out a short little press release very much styled like a tweet, and a bunch of people screencap it and post it on twitter.
We're you expecting interactivity? It's not meant to be a social media platform. Reporting on that was wrong. His social media stuff is coming out in the summer. This is just his personal blog basically.
I was expecting articles/opinions/statements, with titles, and stuff. I give zero shits what DT writes in his daily diary.
Surely he could have found a more competent web designer? And that no interaction is possible makes it deadville. I generally eschew any site that doesn't allow comments/replies.
Why would you avoid any site that has inherently greater probability of good content than your average social media?
Perhaps you don't understand the difference between eschew and 'avoid'.
I like the New York Post and they don't have a comment section. I forgive them.